Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was reading "Introduction to topology, pure and applied" and in the chapter about quotient spaces there was an exercise that asked this:

We have $\mathbb{R}^2-\left\lbrace 0 \right\rbrace$, and the partition it takes in the space are all lines of the form $y=mx$, for all real $m$, including vertical lines. What topological space is that homeomorphic to?

The book actually asks it with a drawing, but I can't paste it here.

So after thinking for a while I've concluded that it's homeomorphic to $S^1$. This is my reasoning that I would like to know if it's right:

First of all, we can identify lines by the angle they have with the horizontal axis, having that angle is $\varphi\in [0,\pi)$. Now, for a union of lines to be an open set, we must have some $\bigcup_{\varphi\in(a,b)} r_\varphi$, being $r_\varphi$ the line with that angle. I identify this with the open sets of the circle, if we name the points of $S^1$ by the same angle, this time $\phi\in[0,2\pi)$, so the points are $p_\phi$ then we can set the function $$r_\varphi \longmapsto p_{2\varphi}$$

This obviously sends open spaces to open spaces. Is my intuition correct? I think it is. How could I formalize this.

share|improve this question
    
It's quite formal already. You should find prove that your map is actually a homeomorphism. A good way of looking at it is that instead of identifying lines passing through zero, you can consider $S^1$ and identify $x$ with $-x$. Then it's it's easy to see that resulting space is compact, thus you just have to exhibit a continuous bijection, because then the continuity of the inverse you get for free (since maps from compact sets send closed sets to closed sets). –  xyzzyz May 8 '13 at 19:23
    
Thanks for your comment. I will try that. –  MyUserIsThis May 8 '13 at 19:38
    
@xyzzyz By the way. Can you link me some proof of this: since maps from compact sets send closed sets to closed sets? I didn't know that. Is that restricted to some kind of maps? –  MyUserIsThis May 8 '13 at 19:43
1  
First of all, i'm assuming all spaces involved are Hausdorff. Then, the image of a compact set is a compact set (this is an easy exercise), a compact subset of Hausdorff space is closed, a closed subset of a compact set is compact. Thus, if $f: X \to Y$ is continuous, $X$ is compact, and $K \subset X$ is closed, then $K$ is compact, so $f(K) \subset Y$ is also compact, thus it's closed. –  xyzzyz May 8 '13 at 21:06
    
@xyzzyz Ok, thanks for that. –  MyUserIsThis May 8 '13 at 21:23

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

You're almost there. But you need to think about lines with angle approaching $\pi$. Maybe you want to think about $[0,\pi]$ and a new quotient topology question :)

share|improve this answer
    
What I thought about that was that the line $r_\pi$ is the same line as the line $r_0$. And so the only possible discontinuity that could appear, which were at the limits of the interval, disappears because the two points are actually the same. What I didn't know how to formalize was that: How to send open sets to open sets when the set contains the limit angle $r_0$. What exactly do you mean by new quotient topology question? Just taking $\pi$ as another line and defining the new quotient space with a partition containing bot $r_0$ and $r_\pi$? Like gluing the extremes of a line? –  MyUserIsThis May 8 '13 at 19:41
    
You're right there! You want to see that if you take $[0,\pi]$ and identify $0$ and $\pi$, the resulting topological space is homeomorphic to $S^1$. –  Ted Shifrin May 8 '13 at 19:47
    
What I don't get is how that proves my initial statement. That would be the circle, but it wouldn't be the quotient space I started with, but a quotient space defined on that quotient space... –  MyUserIsThis May 8 '13 at 20:23
    
Well, conceptually, you're thinking of the space of lines as being homeomorphic to $[0,\pi]$ with the endpoints identified, and then you compose with the homeomorphism to $S^1$. Your original attempt was flawed because you didn't know how to make lines whose angles were close to $\pi$ be close to lines whose angles were close to $0$. There are other ways around this, but I was suggesting the way I thought best fit the way you were thinking. –  Ted Shifrin May 8 '13 at 22:54
    
oh, ok, I get it now. thanks for your help. –  MyUserIsThis May 8 '13 at 23:26

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.