Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Kai Lai Chung's A Course in Probability Theory,

  1. Theorem 6.3.1 says:

    enter image description here

  2. Then he provides Theorem 6.3.2, which is not included in this post, and then gives a corollary of Theorem 6.3.2,

    enter image description here

I was wondering if the above corollary of Theorem 6.3.2 is the reverse of Theorem 6.3.1, under the same condition of Theorem 6.3.1: $\{\mu_n, 1\leq n \leq \infty\}$ be p.m.'s on $\mathbb R^1$ with ch.f.'s $\{f_n, 1 \leq n \leq \infty\}$?

In other words, is the condition "$\{\mu_n, 1\leq n \leq \infty\}$ be p.m.'s on $\mathbb R^1$ with ch.f.'s $\{f_n, 1 \leq n \leq \infty\}$" in Theorem 6.3.1 same as the condition " $\{\mu_n, 1\leq n \leq \infty\}$ and ch.f.'s $\{f_n, 1 \leq n \leq \infty\}$ are corresponding p.m.'s and ch.f.'s" in the corolary of Theorem 6.3.2?

Thanks and regards!

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.