Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm looking for someone to point me in the direction of papers or books which discuss when a topological space (perhaps with the conditions locally compact, Hausdorff) is a topological manifold, differentiable manifold, etc. This is to say, what work work has been done on necessary conditions for these classifications, knowing very little about the original space?

share|cite|improve this question
I think I misunderstood your question, but well, a manifold is defined as a hausdorff, second countable and locally euclidean of dimension $n$ topological space, so if a topological space satisfies those requirements it'll be a manifold. Was that what you were looking for? – user1620696 May 5 '13 at 14:31
up vote 1 down vote accepted

If I understand your question, you are asking about the so-called "Recognition problem for (topological) manifolds". I am by no means an expert on this, but I recommend the following old survey of Cannon: . (The survey is 35 years old, so surely there are more modern results.)

Anyways, this is a well-known problem in topology, which Cannon states in the following way:

Recognition problem: Find a short list of topological properties, reasonably easy to check, that characterize topologcal manifolds among topological spaces.

The point is that "being locally Euclidean" is not an easy-to-check "intrinsic" property.

One necessary condition is that the space should be a so-called "generalized manifold", meaning that it looks like a manifold from the point of view of local homology or cohomology. (These are also sometimes called "homology manifolds" or "cohomology manifolds".)

It is well-known however, (I think due to Cannon and Edwards) that this algebraic-topology condition alone is not enough to characterize honest topological manifolds, i.e. there are generalized manifolds in every dimension $\geq 3$ which are not topological manifolds.

I hope that points you in the right direction, or at least gives you some terms to google.

share|cite|improve this answer
In this context, see also…. – k.stm May 5 '13 at 15:09
Yes, that post has some answers by people who know much more than I do about this subject. – GCD May 5 '13 at 15:16

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.