Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The equation $x^6 − 5x^4 + 16x^2 − 72x+ 9 = 0$ has

(A) exactly two distinct real roots

(B) exactly three distinct real roots

(C) exactly four distinct real roots

(D) six distinct real roots.

$f(0)>0$ and $f(1)<0$ and $f(3)>0$, so there should be an odd no of roots between 0 and 1 and 1 and 3 but exactly how many?

share|cite|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Hagen von Eitzen, DonAntonio, Lord_Farin, Davide Giraudo, Git Gud May 4 '13 at 11:10

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

up vote 0 down vote accepted

I haven’t tried it, but if you derive your equation twice, you can substitute $z = x^2$, solve for $z$ and get the inflection points of your equation from which you should be able to derive the number of zeros in the original equation.

Let’s see:

$$\frac{d^2}{dx^2}x^6−5x^4+16x^2−72x+9 = 30 x^4 - 60 x^2 + 32$$

Substituting $z = x^2$ and dividing by $2$, for the discriminant of $15z^2 - 30 z + 16$ you get: $900 - 4·15·16 = 900·(1 - \frac{32}{30}) < 0$, so you have no inflection points.

What does this tell us? Essentially that $x^6−5x^4+16x^2−72x+9 - y$ can only have two roots for if it had more than two, then it would have more than one extreme point and then it would have at least one inflection point by Rolle’s theorem.

share|cite|improve this answer

The second derivative of $f(x)=x^6 − 5x^4 + 16x^2 − 72x+ 9 = 0$ is $$f''(x)=30x^4-60x^2+32,$$ which is quadratic in $x^2$ having negative discriminant $-240$ and so is never zero. Since it's positive at $x=0$ we have $f''(x)>0$ for all real $x$, i.e. $f(x)$ is concave up on $\mathbb{R}$. This means $f(x)$ can have at most two real zeros, and you have already shown at least two.

share|cite|improve this answer
I can’t believe you beat me to 26 seconds. – k.stm May 4 '13 at 10:35
It's not a race, your answer is essentially the same. I suppose lots of questions like this could be generated by taking irreducible quadratics, substituting $x^2$ for $x$, then integrating twice (or just adding a linear term which dies off at second derivative). – coffeemath May 4 '13 at 10:48

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.