Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $\mathbb{G}_m$ the multiplicative group, with coordinate ring $\mathbb{C}[x^{\pm 1}]$, and considered as a sheaf of abelian groups over $\mathrm{Spec}\,\mathbb{C}$ in the Zariski topology. Let $X$ be another complex scheme (I am interested in $X$ being a smooth projective variety, but I do not think it matters anyway). Denote by $p$ the structure morphism of $X$ down to $\mathrm{Spec}\,\mathbb{C}$.

There are two (seemingly different) ways of pulling $\mathbb{G}_m$ back to $X$:

  1. As sheaves of abelian groups, $p^{-1}\mathbb{G}_m$ is the sheafification of the presheaf $$(p^{-1}\mathbb{G}_m)^\mathrm{pre}(U) = \varinjlim_{V \supseteq p(U)}\,\mathbb{G}_m(V)$$ Since $p(U)$ is the whole of $\mathrm{Spec}\,\mathbb{C}$ for any nonempty $U$, we have $(p^{-1}\mathbb{G}_m)^\mathrm{pre}(U) = \mathbb{G}_m(\mathrm{Spec}\,\mathbb{C}) = \mathbb{C}^\times$, so $p^{-1}\mathbb{G}_m$ is the locally constant sheaf $\underline{\mathbb{C}^\times}$.
  2. As schemes, the pullback $X \times_{\mathrm{Spec}\,\mathbb{C}}\mathbb{G}_m$ is an abelian group scheme over $X$ whose sheaf of sections is $\mathbb{G}_m(\mathcal{O}_X)$ —that is, the sheaf of functions from $X$ to $\mathbb{G}_m$.

I have always thought that the first construction gave the result of the second, but I seem to have argued otherwise here. Have I made a mistake? Or am I right but the pullback as schemes is some other functor (maybe the exceptional inverse image $p^!$)?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I think this sounds right. While this works when talking about sheaves on topological spaces, we have a problem here because sheaf represented by a scheme "forgets" the scheme structure.

In fact, the category of sheaves on $\text{Spec} \mathbb{C}$ is equivalent (even isomorphic, I think) to the category of sets! So the sheaf on $\text{Spec} \mathbb{C}$ represented by $\mathbb{G}_m$ really is just the (discrete) set of elements of $\mathbb{C}^\times$, and so its pullback really should be a locally constant sheaf.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.