Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I v expanded the vector calculus terms and added them :)


$$\boldsymbol{(\nabla\times B)\times C-(B\times\nabla)\times C}+\boldsymbol\nabla(\boldsymbol B\bullet\boldsymbol C)\\=\boldsymbol{i}\left(\frac{\partial(b_1c_1)}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial(b_1c_2)}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial(b_1c_3)}{\partial z}\right)\\+\boldsymbol{j}\left(\frac{\partial(b_2c_1)}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial(b_2c_2)}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial(b_2c_3)}{\partial z}\right)\\+\boldsymbol{k}\left(\frac{\partial(b_3c_1)}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial(b_3c_2)}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial(b_3c_3)}{\partial z}\right)$$ However I v n ideas to re-collapse it into a term in nabla!! Who can help me!! :((

share|cite|improve this question
What is I v n? I suspect it means I have no. This is not Twitter with a 140 character limit-please spell it out. – Ross Millikan Apr 30 '13 at 13:55

Remember the product rule: $$ \frac{\partial(ab)}{\partial w}=a\frac{\partial b}{\partial w}+b\frac{\partial a}{\partial w} $$

Use this on your terms, note which terms cancel, and then you should get something you can make sense of.

By the way, if you're interested in a more systematic way of doing these sorts of calculations, you should get a book that explains suffix notation. Here is my attack on the problem using suffix notation:

\begin{align} &(\nabla\times B)\times C-(B\times\nabla)\times C + \nabla(B.C) \\ &=e_i(\varepsilon_{ijk}\epsilon_{jpq}\nabla_p(B_qC_k)-\varepsilon_{ijk}\epsilon_{jpq}B_p\nabla_qC_k+\nabla_i(B_kC_k)) \\ &=e_i((\delta_{kp}\delta_{iq}-\delta_{k_q}\delta_{ip})(B_q\nabla_pC_k+C_k\nabla_pB_q-B_p\nabla_qC_k)+B_k\nabla_iC_k+C_k\nabla_iB_k) \\ &=e_i(B_i\nabla_kC_k-B_k\nabla_iC_k+C_k\nabla_kB_i-C_k\nabla_iB_k+B_k\nabla_iC_k+C_k\nabla_iB_k \\ &=e_i(B_i\nabla_kC_k+C_k\nabla_kB_i) \\ &=B(\nabla.C)+(C.\nabla)B \end{align}

share|cite|improve this answer
Suffix notations?? It is quite sticky to me because high schools in HK v n tutored these!! :(( – hd.scania Apr 30 '13 at 13:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.