Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I had a recent question in an assignment that I couldn't complete. We are given the following:

  • $q$ is an odd prime power.

  • $(F,+,\cdot)=\text{GF}\left(q^2\right)$.

  • $K$ is the $q$ element subfield of $F$.

  • $\square=\text{non-zero squares of F}= \{ \alpha^{2i} \} $, where $\alpha$ is a primitive root of $\mathrm{GF}(q^2)$.

  • $\boxtimes=\text{non-squares of F}= \{ \alpha^{2i+1} \} $

(i.e. $F=\square\sqcup\boxtimes\sqcup 0 $)

  • $o \colon F \times F \rightarrow F$ is given by $$a o b = \left\{ \begin{array}{lr} ab & a \in \square \\ ab^q & a \in \boxtimes \\ 0 & a = 0 \end{array}\right.$$ So basically it's regular multiplication with the Frobenius automorphism (sometimes).

For previous parts of the question, I've determined:

  1. $N$ = left near field $(F,+,o)$

  2. $N$ is a vector space over $K$

Now I'm asked to find the number of points in a set $P$, where each point is defined as:

$P$ = set of triples (x,y,z), not all 0, identified up to scalar multiplication of N{0} i.e. $(x,y,z) == (n o x, n o y, n o z)$ $\forall n \in N \{ 0 \}$

So $P$ is the vector space $N^3$

I was hoping to use the follow: for a $n$ dimensional vector space over a finite field of order $q$, we have

$\left( \begin{array}{c} n \\ k \end{array} \right)_q$ k-dimensional subspaces.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_binomial_coefficient under Applications). But I'm unsure how to prove its allowed (or even if it is)

share|improve this question
    
what are you asking? it seems that $P$ is a projective plane over $N$, not "So P is the vector space N^3" –  yoyo May 6 '11 at 12:18
1  
You lost me at the definition of $K$. When you wrote, "$q$-dimensional subfield of $F$," did you mean $q$-element subfield of $F$"? or maybe "$q$-dimensional vector space over $F$"? I can't make sense out of "$q$-dimensional subfield of $F$." –  Gerry Myerson May 6 '11 at 12:47
    
@Gerry, sorry, I meant q-element subfield of F –  Zeophlite May 8 '11 at 2:25
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Yes. The number of elements of P agrees with the usual formula for the number of elements of projective space over a field. This follows by Orbit-Stabilizer, and the fact that the groups and stabilizers have the same size.

Let K be a finite field of size q, where q is an odd prime power, and let F be a finite field of size q2 containing K. We define a new (unital, associative, but only partially distributive) multiplication on F, and call the resulting structure N. N is a 2-dimensional vector space over K and is the (regular) Dickson near-field construction.

In particular, for every nonzero a in N, the map μa:N→N:x↦(a o x) is a K-automorphism of the underlying vector space of N. The set of μa for nonzero a in N forms a group, and P is the set of orbits of the nonzero elements of N3 (a 6-dimensional K-vector space) under this action of μ.

The important feature of μ is that it is sharply transitive, that is, it acts regularly on the nonzero elements of N. If (x,y,z) is a triple of nonzero elements, then μ acts on each component regularly, and the orbit has size |N|−1. If one of the components is 0, say z=0, then in effect μ is only acting on (x,y), and again the orbit has size |N|−1. The only time the argument fails is if x=y=z=0, but this point is discarded for P anyways. In other words, every orbit of μ on N3−0 has size |N|−1, and so the number of orbits is (|N|3−1)/(|N|−1) = q4 + q2 + 1, just like for the projective space over F.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.