Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I read this relation and I am not sure why this is true, is it I can't see why it would be?

$$(e^{ -i\pi/2})^{ -ix}\approx ie^{-\pi x/2} $$ I get that $e^{i\pi/2}=-i$, but I can't see why this relation would be true.

share|cite|improve this question
There must be an error. The quantity on the left is equal to $e^{-\pi x/2}$ exactly; the extra $i$ is not correct. – Michael Grant Apr 26 '13 at 12:17
I don't think the relation is true. The expression on the left is $(-i)^{-ix}$. There is no universal convention for raising $-i$ to a non-integer power, which is what you are trying to do. – Stefan Smith Apr 26 '13 at 23:31

You have to be careful working with complex exponentials because of problems with multivalued logarithms. The exponential $a^b$ for $a,b \in \mathbb{C}$ is usually defined in terms of the multivalued logarithm as $e^{b \log a}$.

As a multivalued expression, we have \begin{align*} (e^{-i \pi/2 })^{-ix} &= e^{-ix \log (e^{-i \pi/2 })} \\ &= e^{-ix (-i\pi/2 + 2\pi i k) } && (k \text{ an integer; } k = 0 \text{ for principle log})\\ &= e^{-x\pi/2 + 2\pi x k} \\ &= e^{2\pi k x}e^{-x\pi/2} \end{align*}

Therefore, for your statement to be true (in the sense that for one branch it works) we would have to have \begin{align*} e^{2\pi k x}e^{-x\pi/2} &= i e^{-x\pi/2} \\ \iff e^{2\pi k x} &= i \\ \iff e^{2\pi k x} &= e^{i \pi / 2} \\ \iff 2 \pi k x &\equiv i \pi / 2 \pmod {2\pi i} \end{align*}

For this to be true, $x$ must be purely imaginary. Let $x = i(m + r)$ where $m$ is an integer and $0 \le r < 1$ real. \begin{align*} 2 \pi k (i(m + r)) &\equiv i \pi / 2 \pmod {2\pi i} \\ \iff 2 \pi i m k + 2 \pi i k r &\equiv i \pi / 2 \pmod {2\pi i} \\ \iff mk + kr &\equiv 1 / 4 \pmod {1} \\ \iff kr &\equiv 1 / 4 \pmod {1} \end{align*}

In summary: the only time your statement could actually be sort of true is when $x$ is purely imaginary, and the fractional part of the imaginary part of $x$ (i.e. $r$ above) multiplied by some integer $k$ has a fractional part of $1/4$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Given $z$, $\omega \in \mathbb{C}$, $z\neq 0$

$$z^{\omega}=e^{\omega Log(z)} $$

where $$Log(z)=log(|z|)+i(arg(z)) $$

Let $ z = e^{-i\frac{\pi}{2}},- $ $\omega=-ix$


$$(e^{-i\frac{\pi}{2}})^{-ix}=e^{-ix(Log(e^{-i\frac{\pi}{2}}))} $$

$$Log(e^{-i\frac{\pi}{2}})=log|1|+i(-\frac{\pi}{2})=-i\frac{\pi}{2} $$


$$(e^{-i\frac{\pi}{2}})^{-ix}=e^{-ix(-i\frac{\pi}{2})}=e^{-\frac{x\pi}{2}} $$

I'm sorry I don't get the factor $i$

share|cite|improve this answer
yeah that is what i get but the factor i is important, mm il have another think – user73685 Apr 26 '13 at 12:07
@user73685 can you give some context? It may be very important – Jorge Apr 26 '13 at 12:09

Use basic index laws.

$$ (e^a)^b = e^{ab} $$ What do you get when you do this?

share|cite|improve this answer
This isn't true in general for complex $a$ and $b$ -- not even as a multivalued expression. – 6005 Apr 26 '13 at 13:30
It wasn't a complete answer, and that was for good reason. – Glen O Apr 26 '13 at 13:42

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.