Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Just wondering...came across this relationship regarding Euler's number in my math tinkerings, but I'm unaware if this particular relationship has a specific name or not:

$$\lim_{x\to\infty}\frac{x^x}{(x-1)^{x-1}} - \frac{(x-1)^{x-1}}{(x-2)^{x-2}} = e$$

So does it have a formal name? Thanks in advance!

share|improve this question
1  
Can you check I TeXed the equation correctly? (A consequence of the timing of the edit is that your example disappeared - it looked like was just to clarify what the equation was supposed to be, so I guess that isn't a problem, but either of us can put it back if you still want it). –  Matt Pressland Apr 24 '13 at 17:06
    
You have it right; thanks for the edit! :) –  Steve Beresh Apr 24 '13 at 17:12
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Almost certainly not! There are infinitely many identities like this.

The reason this works is that the two terms are $\left(1-\frac{1}{x}\right)^{-x} \times (x-1)$ and $\left(1-\frac{1}{x-1}\right)^{-(x-1)} \times (x-2)$, where in both cases the first term $\to e$ as $x\to\infty$ by a statement closely related one of the standard definitions of $e$.

Thus this is more a corollary of the statement $\lim_{n\to\infty}(1+1/n)^n = e$ than an independent fact.

share|improve this answer
    
I can see how $\left(1-\frac{1}{x}\right)^{-x}$ and $\left(1-\frac{1}{x-1}\right)^{-(x-1)}$ are related to $\lim_{n\to\infty}(1+1/n)^n = e$, but where do the $\times (x-1)$ and $\times (x-2)$ fit in with the standard definition? I suppose the reason I found the relationship intriguing is because when you graph the standard definition, on the positive side of the x-axis the line comes from the bottom, comes up, and evens out at y=e. When you graph my relationship, on the positive x-axis the line comes from up top rather than the bottom. –  Steve Beresh Apr 24 '13 at 18:04
    
(a) It's simply that $e\times(x-1)-e\times(x-2) = e$, or $(x-1)-(x-2) = 1$... (b) The same is true of $\left(1-\frac 1 x \right)^{-x}$; it decreases to $e$ from above! –  Sharkos Apr 24 '13 at 23:55
    
Ah, thanks. Makes sense now. Much obliged! –  Steve Beresh Apr 25 '13 at 1:57
    
No problem! I feel slightly guilty for cheating slightly to make my point clearer though - there are $1/x$ terms in the $e$ part, but they're the same so they cancel. –  Sharkos Apr 25 '13 at 9:01
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.