Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Edited:

Given that $f(x_1,x_2,...)=f_1(x_1)f_2(x_2)...$ and $g(x_1,x_2,...)=g_1(x_1)g_2(x_2)...$ are always positive.

Also, $f$ and $g$ are continuous everywhere.

If

$[\displaystyle\prod_{n=1}^∞\int_{-1}^{1}dx_n] f(x_1,x_2,...) =∞$ and

$[\displaystyle\prod_{n=1}^∞\int_{-1}^{1}dx_n] g(x_1,x_2,...) =∞$,

is it necessarily true that

$[\displaystyle\prod_{n=1}^∞\int_{-1}^{1}dx_n] f(x_1,x_2,...)g(x_1,x_2,...) =∞$ ?

For more tricky case, if $g$ is not always positive or negative and

$[\displaystyle\prod_{n=1}^∞\int_{-1}^{1}dx_n] g(x_1,x_2,...) =±∞$ (oscillating),

is it true that

$[\displaystyle\prod_{n=1}^∞\int_{-1}^{1}dx_n] f(x_1,x_2,...)g(x_1,x_2,...) =±∞$?

share|improve this question
1  
Crossposted: mathoverflow.net/questions/63833 –  Zev Chonoles May 4 '11 at 4:59
    
What does $f(x,y)$ continous in $(-\infty, \infty)$ mean? –  Jose27 May 4 '11 at 5:16
    
It was wrongly edited. Sorry. –  user10455 May 4 '11 at 5:18
    
Then either $[a,b]$ or $[c,d]$ is infinite (otherwise none of the integrals you're asking about can be infinite), but then, variants of the functions $f(x,y)=1/x=g(x,y)$ (for $x$ away form $0$) give that the integral of $fg$ isn't necesarily infinite. –  Jose27 May 4 '11 at 5:29

1 Answer 1

Firstly, if we have that f and g are continuous everywhere, then their integrals won't explode over a compact region. In fact, they will have a (finite) absolute max and minima over the region, and their magnitude is bounded by the area of the region times that absolute max/min (whichever is bigger in absolute value).

Secondly, it's not necessarily true. And instead of doing anything formal, I'll just speak of the intuition. Suppose that $ f \equiv 0$ on half of the region $\Omega = [a,b] \times [c,d]$, and that $g \equiv 0$ on the other half of $\Omega$. Then the overall integral is $0$. As we consider larger and larger portions of the plane, we still get that the integral is $0$.

share|improve this answer
    
@user: Although you have changed the question, the intuition behind this answer still applies. Simply let f and g be identically 0 on complementary domains. –  mixedmath May 4 '11 at 10:39

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.