Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A normal operator is defined as $AA^{*}\ =A^{*}A$

Where A is an operator

how do i show the sum of two normal operators is normal? Or find a counter example that shows this is false?

share|cite|improve this question
That is not a definition. For one thing, $x$ needs to be quantified. Will you please provide your assumptions? Operators on what? A complex Hilbert space? Typically a normal operator on a Hilbert space is defined to be an operator that commutes with its adjoint, and it can be proved that an operator $A$ on a Hilbert space $H$ is normal if and only if $\|Ax\|=\|A^*x\|$ for all $x\in H$. It might be easier to answer this question using the usual definition, that $A^*A=AA^*$. – Jonas Meyer Apr 22 '13 at 0:53
Notice that if $A,B$ are normal, you're interested in whether $(A+B)(A+B)^*=(A+B)(A^*+B^*)=AA^*+AB^*+BA^*+BB^*=A^*A+A^*B+B^*A+B^*B$. But you're not given that $AB^*=B^*A$ or $BA^*=A^*B$, so you should figure it's false. I'd look for counterexamples where $A$ and $B$ are unitary acting on $\Bbb{C}^2$. – Kevin Carlson Apr 22 '13 at 2:47
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Try $U_1 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -1 & 0\end{bmatrix}$, $U_2 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0\end{bmatrix}$. Both are unitary, hence normal. However $U_1+U_2 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 2 \\ 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}$, and $(U_1+U_2) e_1 = 0$, but $(U_1+U_2)^* e_1 = 2 e_2$, hence $U_1+U_2$ is not normal.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.