Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Given that the Möbius transformation is:

$f(z) = \frac{az+b}{cz+d}$

$ad-bc \neq 0$ and with $a,b,c$ and $d$ complex numbers written $a= a_1 + a_2i$ etc.

I think I must be missing something because when separating the Möbius transformation in to its real and imaginary parts I got this:

$\frac{(a_1c_1+a_2c_2)z^2 + (b_1c_1+b_2c_2)z +(a_1d_1+a_2d_2)z +(b_1d_1+b_2d_2)}{|c|^2z^2 + |d|^2}$ for the real part... and

$\frac{(a_1c_1-a_2c_2)z^2 + (b_1c_1-b_2c_2)z +(a_1d_1-a_2d_2)z +(b_1d_1-b_2d_2)}{|c|^2z^2 + |d|^2}i$ as the imaginary.

It really looks awful, is there a better way to write this?


Update. Duh. Dumb mistake, reworking them I get this, the point is it's still ugly.

Real: $\frac{(a_1x-a_2y+b_1)(c_1x-c_2y+d_1) -(a_2x+a_1y+b_2)(c_2x+c_1y+d_2)}{(c_1x-c_2y+d_1)^2 - (c_2x+c_1y+d_2)^2}$

$\frac{R(ac)x^2 - 2(a_1c_2 + a_2c_1)xy + (R(ad) + R(bc))x - (R(ab) + R(bc))y - R(ac)y^2 + R(bd)}{(c_1x-c_2y+d_1)^2 - (c_2x+c_1y+d_2)^2}$

Img: $\frac{(a_2x-a_1y+b_2)(c_1x-c_2y+d_1) -(a_1x+a_2y+b_1)(c_2x+c_1y+d_2)}{(c_1x-c_2y+d_1)^2 - (c_2x+c_1y+d_2)^2}$

share|improve this question
1  
Do you genuinely need to have the real and imaginary parts all be in terms of real variables (i.e. real and imaginary parts of input quantities)? If so, then yes, the expressions are positively baroque. –  J. M. May 3 '11 at 4:35

2 Answers 2

Hmm, after trying on my own, what I'm getting is (where $z=x+iy$, as usual):

$$\Re\left(\frac{az+b}{cz+d}\right)=\frac{\mu\,\Re(a)+\nu\,\Im(a)+\xi\,\Re(b)+\eta\,\Im(b)}{\Delta}$$

$$\Im\left(\frac{az+b}{cz+d}\right)=\frac{\mu\,\Im(a)-\nu\,\Re(a)+\xi\,\Im(b)-\eta\,\Re(b)}{\Delta}$$

where

$\mu=|z|^2\Re(c)+\alpha$

$\nu=|z|^2\Im(c)+\beta$

$\xi=x\Re(c)-y\Im(c)+\Re(d)$

$\eta=x\Im(c)+y\Re(c)+\Im(d)$

$\Delta=|z|^2 |c|^2+|d|^2+2\alpha\,\Re(c)+2\beta\,\Im(c)$

and

$\alpha=x\Re(d)+y\Im(d)$

$\beta=x\Im(d)-y\Re(d)$

The usual admonition in programming to "isolate common subexpressions" is a useful way to deal with complexity.

share|improve this answer

This is not the correct splitting: mind that $z$ is complex too, so you have to write $z=x+iy$, if you want to represent $f(z)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y)$. It will get a lot worse...

share|improve this answer
    
thanks, is there any more compact was of representing the repeated terms I have such as (a1c1 + a2c2) ? –  a little don May 2 '11 at 23:38
1  
just as $Re(\overline{ac})$ :) –  Dennis Gulko May 2 '11 at 23:43
    
Thank you! That's what I was trying to think of! Please make that a comment as it's the answer to the question-- even though the way I presented it was flawed. –  a little don May 3 '11 at 0:01

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.