Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $\mathbb T^2$ be the 2-Torus and let $X$ be a topological space.

Is there any way of computing $[\mathbb T^2,X]$, the set of homotopy class of continuous maps $\mathbb T^2\to X$ if I know, for instance, the homotopy groups of $X$?

Actually, I am interested in the case $X=\mathbb{CP^\infty}$. I would like to classify $\mathbb T^1$-principal bundles over $\mathbb T^2$ (in fact $\mathbb T^2$-principal bundles, but this follows easily.)

share|improve this question
As I said on your other question, $\mathbb{CP}^{\infty}$ is a $K(\mathbb{Z}, 2)$, so there is a natural bijection from $[\mathbb{T}^2, \mathbb{CP}^{\infty}]$ to $H^2(\mathbb{T}^2; \mathbb{Z}) \cong \mathbb{Z}$. –  Qiaochu Yuan May 2 '11 at 19:22
@Qaiochu: Of course. I should have realised this myself. Thank you! –  Rasmus May 2 '11 at 19:40
I would still be interested in an answer for general $X$, even though I don't expect a simple answer. –  Rasmus May 2 '11 at 19:44

3 Answers 3

up vote 8 down vote accepted

(Disclaimer. The previous version of this answer contained serious mistake: it didn't take into account non-triviality of the action of $\pi_1$ on $\pi_2$.)

Claim. The set $[\mathbb T^2,X]_*$ (of pointed maps) can be identified with the set $$\{(a,b)\in\pi_1(X)^2|ab=ba\}\times\pi_2(X)/\langle t-t^a,t-t^b\mid t\in\pi_2\rangle,$$ where $(-)^\gamma$ denotes the action of $\pi_1$ on $\pi_n$.

And if $\pi_1$ acts trivially on $\pi_2$, $[\mathbb T^2,X]_\ast\approx\{(a,b)\in\pi_1(X)^2|ab=ba\}\times\pi_2(X)$. In particular, if $\pi_1(X)=0$, $[\mathbb T^2,X]_\ast=[\mathbb T^2,X]\cong\pi_2(X)=H_2(X)$.

Proof (sketch). Indeed, parallel and meridian of $\mathbb T^2$ maps to a pair of elements of $\pi_1(X)$ and the 2-cell of the torus maps to a null-homotopy of $aba^{-1}b^{-1}$, but homotopies between trivial loop and some other null-homotopic loop can be identified (non-canonically!) with $\pi_2(X)$.

Let's see if this element of $\pi_2$ is well-defined. If we move $a$ by some (pointed) homotopy $t$ (that can be again identified with an element of $\pi_2$), we get $s'=s+t-t^b$ (in particular, if either both $a$ and $b$ are trivial or $\pi_1(X)$ acts trivially on $\pi_2(X)$, the element $s$ is well-defined).

/* This kind of elementary obstruction theory (cf.) can be applied, I believe, to any 2-dimensional CW-complex $S$ giving (in the case $\pi_1(X)$ acts trivially on $\pi_2(X)$) $[S,X]\approx H^1(S;\pi_1(X))\times H^2(S;\pi_2(X))$. But in higher dimensions the situation becomes more complicated. */

So, for example, $$[\mathbb T^2,\mathbb CP^\infty]\cong\pi_2(\mathbb CP^\infty)\cong\mathbb Z.$$ But, say, $$[\mathbb T^2,\mathbb R P^2]_\ast\cong(\mathbb Z/2)^2\times\mathbb Z/{\sim}\cong\{(0,0)\}\times \mathbb Z\sqcup\{(0,1),(1,0),(1,1)\}\times\mathbb Z/2$$ (if the element of $\pi_1^2$ is nontrivial, the element of $\pi_2$ is defined only mod 2; and in non-pointed case all $\mathbb Z$ become $\mathbb N$; ref).

share|improve this answer
That's very interesting, thanks. (I fixed a tex-typo.) –  Rasmus May 2 '11 at 20:21
That's very interesting. Can you provide some details about this? And I'm curious whether this kind of argument can be applied to other CW-complexes for example surfaces with higher genus, and other well-known spaces. –  Honglu Nov 15 '11 at 3:37
@Grigory: I'm a little confused by this answer. When I apply this argument to $D^2$ rather than $T^2$ (thinking of $D^2$ as a loop and then a null-homotopy of this loop) I don't seem to get the right thing. –  Qiaochu Yuan Jul 15 at 6:37
@Qiaochu Let's see. In the same spirit for $D^2$ we have 'a' trivial element of $\pi_1$ and an element of $\pi_2$ up to some equivalence relation; and in the part 'Let's see if this element of $\pi_2$ is well-defined' we have $s'=s+t$ — i.e. equivalence relation identifies all elements of $\pi_2$. That's the correct answer. –  Grigory M Jul 15 at 9:51
@Qiaochu ...i.e. $\pi_2(X)/\langle t-t^a,t-t^b\mid t\in\pi_2\rangle$ is actually $H^2(\mathbb T^2;\pi_2(X))$, where $\pi_2(X)$ is the local system s.t. generators of $\pi_1(\mathbb T)$ act as $t\mapsto t^a$ and $t\mapsto t^b$. –  Grigory M Jul 15 at 18:33

This is a good chance to advertise the paper

Ellis, G.J. Homotopy classification the J. H. C. Whitehead way. Exposition. Math. 6(2) (1988) 97-110.

Graham Ellis is referring to Whitehead's paper "Combinatorial Homotopy II", not so well read as "Combinatorial Homotopy I".

He writes:" Almost 40 years ago J.H.C. Whitehead showed in \cite{W49:CHII} that, for connected $CW$-complexes $X, Y$ with dim $X \le n$ and $\pi_i Y = 0$ for $2\le i \le \ n - 1$, the homotopy classification of maps $X \to Y$ can be reduced to a purely algebraic problem of classifying, up to an appropriate notion of homotopy, the $\pi_1$-equivariant chain homomorphisms $C_* \widetilde{X} \to C_* \widetilde{Y}$ between the cellular chain complexes of the universal covers. The classification of homotopy equivalences $Y \simeq Y$ can similarly be reduced to a purely algebraic problem. Moreover, the algebra of the cellular chains of the universal covers closely reflects the topology, and provides pleasant and interesting exercises.

"These results ought to be a standard piece of elementary algebraic topology. Yet, perhaps because of the somewhat esoteric exposition given in \cite{W49:CHII}, and perhaps because of a lack of worked examples, they have remained largely ignored. The purpose of the present paper is to rectify this situation."

share|improve this answer

If you want to calculate $[\mathbb T^2,\mathbb CP^\infty]$, perhaps, it's easier to use the classification of maps to $\mathbb CP^\infty$ instead: $[X,\mathbb CP^\infty]=H^2(X)$; so $[\mathbb T^2,\mathbb CP^\infty]=H^2(\mathbb T^2)=\mathbb Z$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.