Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am taking a lectured class in Atiyah-Singer this semester. While the class is moving on really slowly (we just covered how to use Atiyah-Singer to prove Gauss-Bonnet, and introducing pseudodifferential operators), I am wondering how practical this theorem is. The following question is general in nature:

Suppose we have a PDE given by certain elliptic differential operator, how computable is the topological index of this differential operator? If we give certain boundary conditions on the domain (for example, the unit circle with a point removed, a triangle, a square, etc), can we extend the $K$-theory proof to this case? I know the $K$-theory rhetoric proof in literature, but to my knowledge this proof is highly abstract and does not seem to be directly computable. Now if we are interested in the analytical side of things, but cannot compute the analytical index directly because of analytical difficulties, how difficult is it to compute the topological index instead? It does not appear obvious to me how one may compute the Todd class or the chern character in practical cases.

The question is motiviated by the following observation: Given additional algebraic structure (for example, if $M$ is a homogeneous space, $E$ is a bundle with fibre isomorphic to $H$) we can show that Atiyah-Singer can be reduced to direct algebraic computations. However, what if the underlying manifold is really bad? What if it has boundaries of codimension 1 or higher?How computable is the index if we encounter an analytical/geometrical singularity?(which appears quite often in PDE).

On the other hand, suppose we have a manifold with corners and we know a certain operator's topological index. How much hope do we have in recovering the associated operator by recovering its principal symbol? Can we use this to put certain analytical limits on the manifolds(like how bad an operator on it could be if the index is given)?

share|cite|improve this question
I'm not much of a real-analyst, but I also took a class on Atiyah-Singer, and the TA (Dmitri Pavlov) kept a pretty solid webpage with lecture notes, links to important papers, etc. -- here: – Aaron Mazel-Gee Apr 17 '13 at 1:00
@AaronMazel-Gee: Unfortunately according to the professor lectured, none of the existing proofs is detailed enough and a lot of times they appeared to be isomorphic that the same detail is being glossed over. So reading the literature itself is not helpful as one has to prove it oneself. But thanks for the link! – Bombyx mori Apr 17 '13 at 1:47
Ah, sorry about that. Yeah, I knew that I knew little enough not to even try reading your question, so I knew I didn't know whether it'd be answered in those notes. – Aaron Mazel-Gee Apr 17 '13 at 7:13
@AaronMazel-Gee: But it is interesting to see Atiyah-Singer simplified to Riemann-Roch! I only know the proof via Serre duality and so far the two theorems are not connected. I will be happy to read your notes at some point. – Bombyx mori Apr 17 '13 at 7:17
From what I understand, Atiyah--Singer is really a result for compact manifolds without boundary; if you want to deal with boundaries, you instead need Atiyah--Patodi--Singer, which is not quite as robustly topological as Atiyah--Singer, and from there, I'm sure there have been efforts to generalise Atiyah--Patodi--Singer to compact manifolds with corners. – Branimir Ćaćić Apr 17 '13 at 8:43
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The question is answered negatively by Paul Siegel in Mathoverflow. I guess I have learn $ABP$ and $\eta$-invariants...

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.