Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In my real analysis text book there is a question that says:

Decide whether $f(x)=[x]$ is bounded above or below on the interval $[0,a]$ where $a$ is arbitrary, and whether the function takes on it's maximum or minimum value within that same interval.

This question is very straightforward, assuming $[x]=x$. But if that is the case, then the choice of notation is very strange.

Is there another way to interpret the notation's meaning?

share|cite|improve this question
I have seen $\[x\]$ denote the fractional part of $x$, but that doesn't seem to be the desired meaning in this context. – Brandon Carter May 1 '11 at 22:44
I've seen that notation to be the nearest integer function before. – yunone May 1 '11 at 22:44
Could you specify what textbook you're using? I'm guessing there should be a place where the notation used is explained... – J. M. May 1 '11 at 22:47
[x] is often used as the Iverson Bracket, 1 if is x is true, though that's clearly not the usage here. I've also seen it used for either floor or ceiling, when the right brackets (missing either the top or bottom) were difficult to produce. – wnoise May 1 '11 at 23:00
The question is from Michael Spivak's "Calculus" - 4th Edition (also 3rd edition). It's part (xii) of chapter 7 question 1. – objectivesea May 1 '11 at 23:20
up vote 7 down vote accepted

It had been fairly standard for $[x]$ to represent "the greatest integer not greater than $x$" (aka, the "floor" function). With fancier type-setting options allowing for $\lfloor x \rfloor$ for a more suggestive "floor" notation ---as well as $\lceil x \rceil$ for the counterpart "ceiling" ("smallest integer not smaller than $x$")--- I've seen $[x]$ taking on the role of "nearest integer" (that is, the "rounding" function) although $\lfloor x \rceil$ is also available for this, freeing up $[x]$ for author's discretion.

With regard to @Brandon's "fractional part", I've seen that more often represented as $\{ x \}$, usually in conjunction with the floor interpretation of $[x]$, so that one would write $x = [x] + \{x\}$ (at least for non-negative $x$).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.