Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $G$ be a finite group and $H$ a proper subgroup. Then $G$ is not the union of the conjugates of $H$. This is a standard homework problem; Arturo gives a nice solution here.

It is also not possible for $G$ to be $H_1 \cup H_2$ with $H_1$ and $H_2$ both proper subgroups, by a simple counting argument.

It is possible to have $G = \bigcup_g g H_1 g^{-1} \cup \bigcup_g g H_2 g^{-1}$. Consider, for example $G=S_3$, $H_1 = A_3$ and $H_2 = S_2$. See this paper for results on covering $S_n$ and $A_n$ in this way, and this paper for covering $GL(n, q)$.

It is also possible that $G = \bigcup_{\alpha \in \mathrm{Aut}(G)} \alpha(H)$. For example, $G = (\mathbb{Z}/p)^2$ and $H = \mathbb{Z}/p$.

Is it possible that $G$ is a finite group, $\alpha$ an order $2$ automorphism, and $H$ a proper subgroup, such that $G= \bigcup_{g \in G} g H g^{-1} \cup \bigcup_{g \in G} g \alpha(H) g^{-1}$?

This is essentially the group theory question that arises if you try to answer this question. More precisely, that question doesn't need $\alpha^2$ to be the identity, it just needs $\alpha^2$ to be inner.

share|cite|improve this question
Did you check the symmetric group $S_6$ with an outer automorphism? [$H$ being an $S_5$; I'm not sure if the product of a $2$- and a $4$-cycle is contained in the union] –  j.p. Apr 15 '13 at 13:36
Good idea, but it doesn't work (at least for that choice of $H$). The outer automorphism takes the conjugacy class $(12)(3456)$ to itself. –  David Speyer Apr 15 '13 at 13:37
You're right, here's a reference:… –  j.p. Apr 15 '13 at 13:48
Not sure that this is helpful or not, but note that $x=\alpha(h)^g$ if and only if $\alpha(x)=h^{\alpha(g)}$. So the question can be rephrased as saying: does there exist an $H\lt G$, such that for every $x\in G$, either $x$ or $\alpha(x)$ is contained in one of the conjugates $H^g$? I don't know how I feel about the validity of this question, but my intuition is that a good starting place is a group where there are many small conjugacy classes, and $H$ "eats up" many of them with its conjugates. –  user641 Apr 15 '13 at 21:36
Noting that $\alpha$ must clearly be an outer automorphism, we see that it is equivalent to ask if $G=\bigcup_{\theta\in \mathcal{I}\cup\mathcal{I}\alpha}H^\theta=\bigcup_{\theta\in A}H^\theta$ where $\mathcal{I}=\operatorname{Inn}(G)$ and $A$ is the complete inverse image of $\langle \alpha \mathcal{I}\rangle$ in $\operatorname{Aut}(G)$. Since you noted that $\bigcup_{\theta\in\operatorname{Aut}(G)}H^\theta$ can sometimes be a group, it makes sense to look for examples in the finite simple groups, as many of them satisfy $|\operatorname{Out}(G)|=2$. –  Alexander Gruber Apr 15 '13 at 23:07

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The answer is no, by a result of Jan Saxl which requires the classification of the finite simple groups, and a previous result of Klingen which reduces matters to a question about simple groups. See for Saxl's paper.

share|cite|improve this answer
Hi Peter, welcome to math.stackexchange! Why does a positive answer require the classification? Shouldn't an example be enough? (Unfortunately I can't access the link to verify if you meant "The answer is no".) –  j.p. Jun 14 '13 at 12:16
Thanks, sorry, as you apparently expected I meant to say `no'. Fixed now. –  Peter Mueller Jun 14 '13 at 12:26
Thanks! I added a CW answer back at the earlier question pointing to this one. –  David Speyer Jun 14 '13 at 14:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.