Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How do I prove this conjecture?

Let $A$ be a matrix, and $B$ be a column vectore. If $Ax=B$ has two solutions, then there must be a third one.

Thanks in a advance!

share|improve this question
    
One of the theorems you already know about the number of solutions to a system of equations can be applied.... –  Hurkyl Apr 13 '13 at 14:44
2  
Given any two vectors $x,y$ in a vector space over an infinite field $F$, their span $\mbox{Span}\;\{x,y\}=Fx+Fy$ is infinite as soon as one of them is nonzero. –  1015 Apr 13 '13 at 15:04

3 Answers 3

up vote 3 down vote accepted

You can do even better than that, assuming your field is infinite. Suppose that $Ax_1=b$ and $Ax_2=b$, where $x_1\ne x_2$. Now, for any $t$ in your scalar field, define $y_t:=tx_1+(1-t)x_2$. Now, $y_1=x_1$ and $y_0=x_2$, and generally, for $s\ne t$ we have $y_s\ne y_t$ (why?). What is $Ay_t$? In this way, we see that we have infinitely many solutions, so long as the scalar field is infinite.

share|improve this answer
    
Sorry... I feel dumb on this one. How is, for instance, $Ay_3$ a solution? –  ohad Apr 13 '13 at 15:42
    
Don't forget that $A(x+y)=Ax+Ay$ for any (appropriately-sized) column vectors $x,y,$ and that $A(cx)=c(Ax)$ for any scalar $c$ and any (appropriately-sized) column vector $x$. –  Cameron Buie Apr 13 '13 at 16:09
    
In your particular example, $A(3x_1)=3b$ and $A(-2x_2)=-2b$, whence $Ay_3=3b+-2b=b.$ –  Cameron Buie Apr 13 '13 at 16:24
    
Thank you. I just fail to understand why this happens really. I also fail using the @ function. Thanks again!!! –  ohad Apr 13 '13 at 17:02
    
When you comment on a question or answer, the original poster is notified automatically, so there's no need to use the @ in that case. As for why matrix multiplication distributes over vector addition, and why we can pull scalars out front, that's just a nice consequence of the way matrix multiplication is defined. For example, suppose $A$ is an $m\times n$ matrix with $a_{ij}$ indicating the entry of $A$ in the $i$th row, $j$th column. Let $x$ and $y$ be $n$-dimensional column vectors, with respective entries $x_1,\dots,x_n$ and $y_1,\dots,y_n$. Let $c$ be a scalar. (cont'd). –  Cameron Buie Apr 13 '13 at 18:39

Hint: How could you linearly combine two solutions to make a third?

share|improve this answer

Suppose $x_1$ and $x_2$ are two (different) solutions, namely $Ax_1=B,Ax_2=B$. Then $A(x_2-x_1)=0$. Let $r$ be the nullity of $A$ and $y_1,\cdots,y_r$ be linearly independent solutions of $Ay=0$. Then $$ x=x_1+c_1y_1+\cdots+c_ry_r $$ is the general solution of $Ax=B$. Thus there are infinite many solutions (of course, there is a third one).

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks! I have a lot to work on in this course. Thanks again to all! –  ohad Apr 13 '13 at 15:13
1  
@ohad: It's worth noting that we don't require linearly independent solutions to prove this. –  Cameron Buie Apr 13 '13 at 15:33
    
(+1): Glad to help. –  Cameron Buie Apr 13 '13 at 16:22

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.