Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have never taken complex analysis, but I am preparing for a GRE for this week end and I am trying to learn a bit about Laurent Series.

So far what I get is that the Laurent Series are of form $$\Sigma_{i=1}^\infty {a_{-i}(z-z_0)^{-i}} + \Sigma_{j=1}^\infty {a_j(z-z_0)^i}$$

where $a_i$ is the usual Taylor coefficients and $a_{-j}$ is given by $${1\over{2\pi i}} \int_c {f(z)dz \over {(z-z_0)^{-j+1}}}$$.

I have absolutely no idea how this works, but I saw that in practice, we just manipulate the Taylor Series to get the Laurent Series some how.

For example, the Taylor expansion of $1\over 1-z$ is $1+z+z^2+...$ for $|z|<1$.

So this is what I would really like to understand. Supposedly in order to "avoid" the singularity at Z = 1, now $1 \over 1-z$ must be expanded in a Laurent Series in the region $1<|z|<+\infty$. To do so the series will be manipulated as such $${1 \over 1-z} = {1 \over {z({1\over z}-1})} = {-1 \over z } ・{1\over {1-{1\over z}}} $$

Since $1<|z|$, $|1/z|<1$, so the Taylor expansion gives us $${-{1 \over z}}-({1 \over z})^2- ・・・$$ for $1<|z|$.

I only have a couple of example problems in the GRE practice book, and I failed to understand all of them. I recon that I am not getting the motivation of when to use the Taylor Series and when the Laurent.

I would also like to claim that since they both represent $1 \over {1-z}$, why do they look different and HOW are they different ?

My book also did not generalize how to manipulate the Taylor Series to make it into a Laurent series, so can someone guide me to where I could learn this a little bit more with concrete examples and details or explain this to me?

I know I am asking a lot, but mathematics means the life to me and I want to do as good as possible on the GRE.

share|improve this question
    
Taylor for holomorphic, Laurent in presence of isolated singularities. They are different because in the practice, you must have a concept of infinite summation where negative powers of the variable appear –  Federica Maggioni Apr 13 '13 at 8:46
    
Thanks! I will start by looking for what holomorphic means. –  hyg17 Apr 14 '13 at 4:38
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Well the taylor series only work when your function is holomorphic, the laurent series works still for isolated singularities.

They both represent the function, but the only converges when $|z|>1$ and the other only converges when $|z|<1$.

When $f$ is holomorphic the taylor series and the laurent series are the same, and with Cauchy's theorem you can see that. If you want to be as good as possible you have to calculate those things on your own, thats how you learn the most.

If you want some exercises come to chat, or search in google, and if you can't solve them ask a new question.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks! I will look up what holomorphic means and probably go on chat and ask for some more examples I can work on. –  hyg17 Apr 14 '13 at 4:39
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.