Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If $X$ is a topological space, and $A, B\subset X$ are not disjoint and both path connected, it intuitively makes sense that $A\cup B$ is path connected: If, for $x_0\in A$ and $x_1\in B$ you take an $\tilde{x}\in A\cap B$ and continuous $\gamma_A:[0,1]\rightarrow A$ and $\gamma_B:[0,1]$ with $\gamma_A(0) = x_0, \gamma_A(1) = \tilde{x} = \gamma_B(0)$ and $\gamma_B(1) = x_1$, you can just take the function that sends $s$ to $\gamma_A(2s)$ for $s\leq \frac{1}{2}$ and $\gamma_B(2s-1)$ for $s\geq\frac{1}{2}$. (Basically, if we are looking at the non-trivial case where $x_0$ is in one of the sets and $x_1$ is in the other, you make a path by joining two continuous paths together, which you know exist because $A$ and $B$ are path connected).

Call this function $\gamma$, then $\gamma$ meets the requirements that $\gamma(0) = x_0, \gamma(1) = x_1$. Now we just need to verify that $\gamma$ is continuous. I'm trying to do so by looking at an open set $U\in\mathcal{T}_{A\cup B}$, and verifying that $\gamma^{-1}(U)$ is an open interval in $[0,1]$. However, this is where I'm stuck. I tried to work it from the angle that $U = U_1\cup U_2$ with $U_1\subset A, U_2\subset B$, but then I need $U_1$ and $U_2$ to be open, which I don't know how to prove.

Is this the way to go? Or is there a different way to approach the problem?

share|improve this question
    
You should precisely not look at open sets, but closed sets and use: $\gamma$ is continuous if and only if $\gamma^{-1}(F)$ is closed for every closed set $F$. –  1015 Apr 12 '13 at 21:20

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

So $\gamma$ is continuous if and only if it is seqentially continuous, as $[0,1]$ is a metric space. At $x\in [0,1/2)$ or $(1/2,1]$, we can simply use the continuity of $\gamma_A$ and $\gamma_B$ respectively. The only delicate point is $x_0=1/2$. For $x_n\longrightarrow (1/2)^-$, we have $\lim \gamma(x_n)=\lim \gamma_A(2x_n)=\gamma_A(1)=\tilde{X}$.And for $x_n\longrightarrow (1/2)^+$, we have $\lim \gamma(x_n)=\lim \gamma_B(2x_n-1)=\gamma_B(0)=\tilde{X}$. I only remains to convince yourself that this suffices for the general case $x_n\longrightarrow 1/2$ to hold, which can be done by considering the possibly finite subsequences $x_n^+$ and $x_n^-$ of all $x_n$ greater than $1/2$ and less than $1/2$ respectively.

Now this was a tedious argument and certainly not the way we should do that. Here is a more general, purely topological fact, which makes everything easier to write. And which is the real reason behind this. The key fact is that the closed sets of a topology induced by a topological set $X$ on a closed subset $F$ are precisely the closed sets of $X$ contained in $F$. Note that this is false in general if $F$ is not closed. See the remninder below.

Lemma: let $f:X\longrightarrow Y$ be a function between two topological spaces. If there exist two closed sets $F_1,F_2$ in $X$ such that $X=F_1\cup F_2$ and both $f_1:=f_{|F_1}$ and $f_2:=f_{|F_2}$ are continuous for the induced topology on $F_1$ and $F_2$ respectively, then $f$ is continuous.

Remark: the same fact holds if you replace closed by open.

Proof: We will show that for every $F$ closed in $Y$, $f^{-1}(F)$ is closed in $X$, which is equivalent to the continuity of $f$. So take $F$ closed in $Y$ and observe $$ f^{-1}(F)=f_1^{-1}(F)\cup f_2^{-1}(F). $$ By assumption, each $f_j^{-1}(F)$ is closed in $F_j$ for the induced topology, i.e. there exists $G_j$ closed in $X$ such that $f_j^{-1}(F)=G_j\cap F_j$. Hence $f_j^{-1}(F)$ is a fortiori closed in $X$ and $f^{-1}(F)$ is the union of two closed sets, whence closed in $X$. QED.

Application: apply this to $f=\gamma$ on $X=[0,1]$ with $F_1=[0,1/2]$ and $F_2=[1/2,1]$.

Reminder: if $X$ is a topological space and $S$ is a subset of $X$. Then the topology induced by $X$ on $S$ is that where the open (resp. closed) sets all sets of the form $S\cap U$ (resp. $S\cap F$) for some $U$ open in $X$ (resp $F$ closed in $X$). These need not be open (resp. closed) in $X$ in general. As this would imply in particular that $S$ is open (resp. closed) in $X$.

For example, for $X=[0,1]$ and $S=[0,1/2)$, then $[0,1/2)$, like any $[1/2-1/n,1/2)$ is closed in $[0,1/2)$ for the induced toplogy. Indeed we can write $[1/2-1/n,1/2)=[0,1/2)\cap [1/2-1/n,1]$ as the intersection of $[0,1/2)$ by a closed set of $[0,1]$.

share|improve this answer
    
I don't understand why $f_j^{-1}(F)$ would have to be closed in $F_j$: Why does this $G_j$ have to exist? –  Radical Apr 12 '13 at 21:39
    
My assumption is: $f_j:F_j\longrightarrow Y$ is continuous, where $F_j$ is equipped with the topology induced by $X$. In this topology, the closed sets are precisely of the form $F_j\cap F$ with $F$ closed in $X$. So these are precisely the closed subsets of $X$ which are contained in $F_j$. In your case, $\gamma_j(x)=\gamma(2x)$ is indeed continuous on $[0,1/2]$. So in this case, it is obvious that the closed sets of $[0,1/2]$ are closed in $[0,1]$. In the general topological case, it goes like I said above. –  1015 Apr 12 '13 at 21:50

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.