Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was just looking at Euler's reflection formula for Gamma function which states $$\Gamma (1-z)\Gamma (z)=\frac { \pi }{ \sin { (z\pi ) } } $$ but it seems to me that one more reflection formula could exist so that $$\Gamma (c+x)=\Gamma (c-f\left( x \right) )?$$ where $c\approx 1.46163$ the local minimum for Gamma function where x>0.

Our first impressions would be that $$f\left( x \right) >f(y),\quad x>y\\ f(0)=0\\ f(2-c)=c-1\\ Im(f(x))=[0,c>$$.

Can such function exist, and still follow Euler's reflection formula?

share|cite|improve this question
f(x) = -x ?? would work... – Gautam Shenoy Apr 12 '13 at 11:07
no, not even closely, the function must be defined on the whole $[0,+infinity>$ while it's image must be $Im(f(x))=[0,c>$ – user1398593 Apr 12 '13 at 11:11
it would be similar to arcus tangens function – user1398593 Apr 12 '13 at 17:46

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.