Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I read in some notebook that $C$ small implies $Set^{C^{op}}$ locally small, but I don't see what is the reasoning used, because the Yoneda lemma is not mentioned so that it is probably not needed...

Could somebody propose me a track?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

When $C$ is a small category and $D$ is a locally small category, then $D^C$ is locally small. The reason is that for functors $F,G : C \to D$ the set of natural transformations $F \to G$ embeds into $\prod_{x \in \mathrm{ob}(C)} \hom(F(x),G(x))$, which is a product of sets, therefore also a set.

share|improve this answer
1  
Now $\hom(F(x),G(x))$ is in $D$. So, this argument also uses that $D$ is locally small. E.g. let $D$ be a big monoid, and $C:=1$ the terminal category... –  Berci Apr 9 '13 at 19:11
    
@Berci There are people who don't believe in categories that are not locally small... –  Zhen Lin Apr 9 '13 at 19:18
    
Thank you very much Martin and Berci! Yes, I agree with Berci, this last part uses the fact that $D = Set$ so that its $hom$ are sets. –  almaus Apr 9 '13 at 19:19
    
Sure. I've corrected it. –  Martin Brandenburg Apr 9 '13 at 19:28
    
@Zhen, you are wrong. As explained on MO, spans categories are not locally small... –  almaus Apr 9 '13 at 19:28

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.