Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it true that given any vector space $V$ over any field $F$ we have $(\alpha-\beta)(x-y)=\alpha x-\alpha y-\beta x+\beta y$ for all $x,y \in V$ and $\alpha,\beta \in F$?

I figured that, for example, if, say, $a$ and $b$ are contained in a field $F$, which—by definition—is a commutative associative ring, which, similarly, is—by definition—an additive abelian group, then the equation \begin{eqnarray} x+a & = & b \end{eqnarray} has a unique solution. This is because if we consider $s$ a solution to the above equation—that is, $s+a=b$, then \begin{eqnarray} (s+a)+(-a) & = & b+(-a), \end{eqnarray} so \begin{eqnarray} (s+a)+(-a) & = & s+(a+(-a)) & = & s+0 & = & s, \end{eqnarray} thus \begin{eqnarray} s & = & b+(-a). \end{eqnarray}

This being the case—that is, this uniqueness, then

\begin{eqnarray} (\alpha-\beta)= \alpha+(-\beta) \end{eqnarray}

should be a unique scalar in $F$, so by the multiplicative distributivity of vectors in a vector space shouldn't the proposed operation hold for all vector spaces of and arbitrary non-single-element field? I don't even know if my thoughts are in the right place really. Any help is appreciated.

share|cite|improve this question
What about $GF(2)$? – Trancot Apr 8 '13 at 6:25
Vinberg says that "[a] ring that consists of only zero is not regarded as a field," but what about non-zero single-element rings? Is that even possible? – Trancot Apr 8 '13 at 6:28
No. A ring, by definition, has a zero element; if the ring has only one element, it's got to be zero. – Zev Chonoles Apr 8 '13 at 6:29
@Trancot You can edit your question, no need to leave the above remarks as comments. – Git Gud Apr 8 '13 at 6:29
@ZevChonoles How should I approach proving this? – Trancot Apr 8 '13 at 6:36

In a word, yes. Wikipedia's entry on modules says this explicitly among the module axioms in the formal definition. A vector space is a module over a field.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.