Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I work with the Annuity present value factor, which I want to differentiate with respect to r:

$$\sum_{t=T_1}^{T_2} (1+r)^{-t}$$ which equals $$\frac{(1 + r)^{1 - T_1} - (1 + r)^{-T_2}}{r}$$

If I use the derivation of the Sum-expression I can easily proof, that the derivative with respect to r ist <0. If i do the same with the other (but equal) term, after some transforming I am stuck with $$(1 + r)^{1 + T_2} \cdot (1 + r \cdot T_1) < (1 + r)^{T_1} \cdot (1 + r \cdot(1+ T_2))$$ at which point I don't see how to proceed. How to solve this inequation? There must be some math rules or relations I am missing.

EDIT: The conditions are $0<r<1,\quad T_1\geq 1 \quad T_1<T_2$

EDIT: I tried to follow @Ross's instructions. I then end up with $$\frac{(1+r\cdot(1+T_2))}{(1+r\cdot T_1)} < (1+r)^{1+T_2-T_1}$$ Unfortunately I still don't know how to proceed from there on.

share|cite|improve this question
If you put your equations between dollar signs for inline math and double dollar signs for displayed math, you can use LaTeX, given that you are familiar with that. EDIT: If you try to edit your question, you can see how it works. – Raeder Apr 27 '11 at 15:24
@Raeder: Thanks, that's really convenient :) – meep.meep Apr 27 '11 at 15:29
up vote 2 down vote accepted

When I fed it to Alpha the numerator comes out $(1+r+rT_2)(1+r)^{-1-T_2}-(1+rT_1)(1+r)^{-T_1}$. If you want this to be less than zero, the inequality comes out in the opposite sense from yours. If you divide by $(1+r)^{T_1}$ you get $(1+r+rT_2)\lt(1+rT_1)(1+r)^{1+T_2-T_1}$, then if you use $(1+r)^{1+T_2-T_1}\gt 1+r(1+T_2-T_1)$ you can get the RHS is greater than $(1+rT_1)(1+r(1+T_2-T_1))$ which is still greater than the LHS. As all the steps are reversible, we know the original is less than $0$

Added: We want to prove $(1+r+rT_2)\lt(1+rT_1)(1+r)^{1+T_2-T_1}$. As $(1+r)^x \gt 1+xr$, $(1+rT_1)(1+r)^{1+T_2-T_1} \gt (1+rT_1)(1+r)(1+T_2-T_1)=(1+r+rT_1+r^2T_1)(1+T_2-T_1)$



share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for your help. Unfortunately I still don't get your last steps (I've edited my question). Could you be so kind to explain how you get to your last 2 expressions and why the "greater than" conditions apply? That would be great... – meep.meep Apr 27 '11 at 18:15
Thanks again, now I understood it all :) – meep.meep Apr 28 '11 at 9:02

Let $v = \frac{1}{1+r}$. Then the present value is $$v^{T_1}+v^2+ \cdots + v^{T_2}$$ $$=v^{T_1}(1+v^{2-T_1} + \cdots + v^{T_2-T_1})$$ $$= v^{T_1} \left(\frac{1-v^{T_2-T_{1}+1}}{1-v} \right)$$ $$= v^{T_1-1} \left(\frac{1-v^{T_2-T_{1}+1}}{v^{-1}-1} \right)$$

So the derivative with respect to $v$ is $$\frac{-(T_2+1)v^{T_2+1}+T_{2}v^{T_{2}+2}-(T_{1}-1)v^{T_{1}+1}+T_{1}v^{T_{1}}}{(v-1)^{2}v}$$

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks... The thing is, I need the proof that this derivation is $<0$. – meep.meep Apr 27 '11 at 18:17

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.