Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Rudin defined the integral of a nonnegative measurable function f as the supremum of a set of integrals of simple functions less than f.

With the assumption of f being bounded, how could I define the integral of f in terms of infimum of a set of integrals of simple functions greater than f. ?

What I got so far: Let f<=M, then integral of f is <= integral of M. M is a constant function hence is measurable and simple. Should I show the integral of M is the infimum of set?

Or should I start working on the integral of M-f, which is nonnegative measurable. The integral of M-f hence can be expressed as the sup of a set of integrals of simple functions less than M-f.

This definition appears in a paper which skips the proof. I would like a solid argument of it.

Please help!

share|improve this question
    
Considering $M-f$ seems like the thing to do. –  Hagen von Eitzen Apr 7 '13 at 19:38
    
Thanks. But I am stuck on how to transfer from sup to inf if I use the sup definition for the integral of M-f. Could you please help me with the details? –  user65214 Apr 7 '13 at 19:56

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.