Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

(a) Suppose $P(x,y)$ and $Q(x,y)$ are conjugate harmonic functions and $C$ is any simple closed curve, prove that $\displaystyle \oint_C P\,dx + Q \,dy = 0$.
(b) If for all simple closed curves $C$ in the region $R$ , $\displaystyle \oint_C P\,dx + Q \,dy = 0$, is it true that $P$ and $Q$ are harmonic conjugate functions? i.e. is converse of (a) true?

For (a) since they are harmonic conjugate functions so they should satisfy Cauchy-Riemann equations and using Green's theorem, it can be shown. The problem is asked under the topic Morera's theorem. Can it be shown using Morera's theorem? How is it related to Morera's theorem?

For (b), the closed loop integral for all curves implies $\displaystyle \frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}$. How show that it is harmonic or non harmonic?

EDIT:: There seems to be a problem which states that if $\displaystyle \oint_C Pdx + Q dy = 0$ for all curves in the region bound by $C$ then show $\displaystyle \oint_C Q\,dx - P \,dy = 0$. I can't prove this either but I think they are equivalent.

Help!!

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

(a) When $P$ and $Q$ are conjugate real harmonic functions of $(x,y)$ on a simply connected domain $\Omega\subset{\mathbb C}$ then $f:=P+iQ$ is an analytic function of $z:=x+iy$ on $\Omega$, by definition of "conjugate harmonic". Therefore by Cauchy's theorem for any closed curve $\gamma$ in $\Omega$ one has $$0=\int_\gamma f(z)\ dz=\int_\gamma (P+iQ)\ (dx+i dy)=\int_\gamma (Pdx-Qdy) + i\int_\gamma (Qdx +P dy)\ .$$ It follows that $\int_\gamma (Pdx-Qdy) =0$ for all $\gamma\subset\Omega$. Note the essential hypothesis that $\Omega$ is simply connected. Consider the example $$P(x,y)={y\over x^2+y^2},\quad Q(x,y)={x\over x^2+y^2}\qquad\bigl((x,y)\ne(0,0)\bigr)\ .$$ Then $$P+iQ={ix+y\over x^2+y^2}={i\over z}=:f(z)$$ is analytic on $\Omega:=\dot{\mathbb C}$, but for $\gamma$ the unit circle on has $$\int_\gamma (Pdx-Q dy)={\rm Re}\left(\int_\gamma {i\over z}\ dz\right)=-2\pi\ne0\ .$$ (b) When $\int_\gamma (Pdx+Qdy)=0$ resp. $\int_\gamma (Pdx-Qdy)=0$ for all closed $\gamma\subset\Omega$ this only implies that $(P,Q)=\nabla f$, resp. $(P,-Q)=\nabla f$ for some scalar function $f:\ \Omega\to{\mathbb R}$, but neither $f$ nor its derivatives have to be harmonic.

share|improve this answer
    
could you help me with one part? why is $f(z) = P + i Q$ analytic function? –  Mula Ko Saag Apr 11 '13 at 18:31
    
@Mula Ko Saag: See my edit. –  Christian Blatter Apr 11 '13 at 19:26
    
i asked a similar question could you check it, if you have time. And thank you very much for your time :)) –  Mula Ko Saag Apr 11 '13 at 19:28

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.