I am simply wondering, as the title states, what the central differences are between recursive and recursively enumerable languages? If I am not mistaken a recursive language is a is Turing decidable while a recursively enumerable one is only Turing recognizable but I suspect that is either wrong or does not capture the whole picture. Can anybody give a brief answer?
Tell me more
×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for
people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.
migrated from cstheory.stackexchange.com Apr 26 '11 at 2:06
|
Recursive / Turing-decidable languages have a Turing machine that can always decide in finite time whether a word is in the language. Recursively enumerable / RE / Turing-recognizable languages have a Turing machine that will accept a word in the language in finite time, but not necessarily stop to reject a word that's not in the language. Recursive implies RE but not vice versa. A language and its complement are RE if and only if the language is recursive (which is equivalent to saying that the complement of the language is recursive). |
|||
|
|