Does $G\times K\cong H\times K$ imply $G\cong H$?

Let $G\times K$ be a finite group. Suppoose $G\times K\cong H\times K$. Is this sufficient to imply $G\cong H$?

-
@amWhy, no! This problem actually is arose from there. Notice that I assume $G\times K$ finite. – Easy Apr 3 '13 at 6:34
I deleted the auto generated comment...I see the difference. Thanks for pointing that out. – amWhy Apr 3 '13 at 6:36
Note that this does not hold even when $G\times K (\cong H\times K)$ is finitely presented. See my answer to the original question (or see [R. Hirshon, On Cancellation in Groups, The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 76, No. 9 (Nov., 1969), pp. 1037-1039]). – user1729 Apr 3 '13 at 10:11

Yes. In fact you only need to assume that $K$ is finite; that is, finite groups are cancellable. This is a theorem due to Hirshon.

-
Thanks very much for mentioning this source! – Easy Apr 3 '13 at 7:04

Vipul Naik found an elementary proof:

For any finite groups $L$ and $G$, let $h(L,G)$ denote the number of homomorphisms from $L$ to $G$ and $i(L,G)$ denote the number of monomorphisms from $L$ to $G$. Notice that $$h(L,G)= \sum\limits_{N \lhd L} i(L/N,G) \hspace{1cm} (1)$$

Let $G,H,K$ be three finite groups such that $G \times H \simeq G \times K$. Then \begin{gather}h(L,G \times H)=h(L,G \times K) \\ h(L,G)h(L,H)=h(L,G)h(L,K) \\ h(L,H)=h(L,K)\end{gather} for any finite group $L$, since $h(L,G) \neq 0$. Using $(1)$, it is easy to deduce that $i(L,H)=i(L,K)$ for any finite group $L$ by induction on the cardinality of $L$. Hence $$i(H,K)=i(H,H) \neq 0.$$

Therefore, there exists a monomorphism from $H$ to $K$. Since $H$ and $K$ have the same cardinality, we deduce that $H$ and $K$ are in fact isomorphic.

-

Corollary 8.42: Let $G$ be a non-trivial finitely generated abelian group and let $$G=H_1\times...\times H_m=K_1\times ....\times K_n$$ where $m,n$ are positive integers and $H_i,K_j$ are non-trivial indecomposable subgroups of $G$ Then $m=n$ and, by relabeling the suffices if necessary, $$H_i=K_j$$ for each $i=1,...n$

A Course on Group Theory by J.J.Rose

-
Babak, to the rescue! +1 – amWhy Apr 3 '13 at 6:36
@Babak.S., but this is only abelian groups. I know this result, but is it generally true regardless of abelianess? – Easy Apr 3 '13 at 6:38
@Easy: You mean G,H,K are non abelian? or some of them be? – S. Snape Apr 3 '13 at 6:40
any of the possible cases, or will it be true conditionally? – Easy Apr 3 '13 at 6:41
@Easy: In fact when all three groups are finite, as you noted, you can consider three distinct subgroups of V the 4-klien group such that $$H\times L\cong K\times L$$. I am thinking about non-abelian ones. It seems ok. – S. Snape Apr 3 '13 at 6:53