Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $T: \mathbb{C^2}\rightarrow \mathbb{C^2}$ be a linear map. If exist only one eigenvalue of $T$ and exist $k \neq 0$ where $T^k = I$ then T is diagonalizable.

My solution: If $ \ T^k = I$ then the minimal polynomial $m_T(x)$ divides $x^k -1$. As existe $k$ distinct roots of $x^k -1$ and $T$ has only one eigenvalue $m_T (x) = x- \lambda$ where $\lambda ^k = 1$. So for all vectors $ v \in \mathbb{C^2}$ $m_T(T(v)) = T(v) - \lambda v = 0$, in other words; for all $v \in \mathbb{C^2} \ \Rightarrow v \in Aut_T(\lambda)$. As $Aut_T(\lambda) \subseteq \mathbb{C^2}$ then $Aut_T(\lambda) = \mathbb{C^2}$. Therefore $T$ is diagonalizable.

My problem is: I don't know if it's correct, because I could change $\mathbb{C^2}$ for any $\mathbb{C}^n$ for $n \in \mathbb{N}$. Or this hypothesis is important and I'm not seeing?

share|cite|improve this question
Absolutely. You can prove that directly for $\mathbb{C}^n$. – 1015 Apr 2 '13 at 22:47
up vote 3 down vote accepted

I think you should directly prove a more general result.

Let $A$ be a complex $n\times n$ matrix (or an operator from a finite dimensional complex vector space to itself).

Claim: If there exists $k\geq 1$ such that $A^k=I_n$. Then $A$ is diagonalizable.

Proof: the polynomial $X^k-1=\prod_{j=1}^k(X-\omega_j)$ annihilates $A$. Since the $\omega_j$ here are the $k$-roots of untity and are pairwise distinct, the factors are relatively prime and therefore $$ \mathbb{C}^n=\bigoplus_{j=1}^k\mbox{Ker} (A-\omega_j I_n). $$ Each summand is either trivial or an eigenspace of $A$. Hence $A$ is diagonalizable. QED.

Note: of course, the real generalization, which is true over any field, is: $A$ is diagonalizable if and only if it is annihilated by a polynomial which splits and has only simple roots.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you julien. You helped me a lot. – jon jones Apr 5 '13 at 21:14
@jonjones You're welcome, jon. – 1015 Apr 5 '13 at 21:22

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.