Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a problem in which I'm given a force field $\vec{F}(x,y,z)=x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+ 3\hat{k}$ and a path $\vec{r}(t)=4cos(t)\hat{i}+4sin(t)\hat{j}+3t\hat{k}$ over the interval $0\le t\le 2\pi$. I need to find the work done by the force over the path. My first thought is to take the line integral of the vector field over the path:

$$W=\int_C\vec{F} \cdot d\vec{r} $$

Where C is the path $\vec{r}(t)$ over the interval $0 \le t \le 2\pi$. So I plug the path into $\vec{F}(x,y,z)$ and the integral becomes $$W=\int_0^{2\pi}\vec{F}(\vec{r}(t))\cdot \vec{r}(t)dt$$ $$W=\int_0^{2\pi}(4cos(t)\hat{i}+4sin(t)\hat{j}+3\hat{k})\cdot(4cos(t)\hat{i}+4sin(t)\hat{j}+3t\hat{k})dt$$ $$W=\int_0^{2\pi}(16cos^2(t)+16sin^2(t)+9t)dt$$ $$W=\int_0^{2\pi}(16+9t)dt$$


From this I get $W = 32\pi + 18\pi^2$, but apparently that's the wrong answer. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong?

share|improve this question
    
You must have the inner product by the derivative of $\,r\,$ !:$$\int F(r(t))\cdot r'(t)dt$$ and erase that $\,t\,$ from $\,3k\,$ , too. –  DonAntonio Mar 28 '13 at 4:06
1  
agreed. Also, you're working too hard. This force field is conservative, you could just find a potential function and use the fundamental theorem of calculus for line integrals! –  James S. Cook Mar 28 '13 at 4:07
    
@JamesS.Cook Ah, that is true, I see that because the curl is 0. Unfortunately though, I don't know how to get the potential field from a force field. –  Ataraxia Mar 28 '13 at 4:12
    
@ZettaSuro just guess for something as simple as the $\vec{F}$ you face. You want $U$ such that $\partial_x U = x$, $\partial_y U = y$ and $\partial_z U = 3$. I bet you can guess $U$ without some formal method. (of course, learn the formal method in due time) –  James S. Cook Mar 28 '13 at 4:24
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

The integral is over $\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}$; you did not compute $d\vec{r}$, which is done as follows:

$$d\vec{r} = \frac{d}{dt}\vec{r}(t) \,dt = -4 \sin{t} \,\vec{i} + 4 \cos{t} \,\vec{j} + 3 \vec{k}$$

$$\int_C \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} = \int_C \vec{F}\cdot \frac{d}{dt}\vec{r}(t) \,dt $$

which you should now be able to do.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.