Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Use Lagrange multipliers to find the maximum and minimum values of the function subject to the given constraint. (If an answer does not exist, enter DNE.) $ \ \ f(x, y, z) = xyz \ ; \ \ x^2 + 2y^2 + 3z^2 = 96$

What I have gotten to: $\Delta f = \ <yz, xz, xy>$ and $\Delta g = \ λ<2x, 4y, 6z>$

set them equal and get: $x^2 = 2y^2$ and $z^2 = \frac{2}{3} y^2$ .

Then: $$ \begin{cases}x^2 + 2y^2 +3z^2 = 96 \\ 6y^2 = 96 \\ y = \pm16 \end{cases} $$

Plugging $y$ into $z^2$ and $x^2$ equations above, you get the points: $(\pm16\sqrt{2}, \ \pm 16, \ \pm16\sqrt{2/3} ) \ .$

Plugging the points back into $f$, I got a maximum of $32\sqrt{3}$ and a minimum of $-32\sqrt{3}$.

Where did I go wrong?

Thank you in advance!

share|cite|improve this question
your edit is strange, we write $\nabla f=\lambda\nabla g$. – Brady Trainor Mar 28 '13 at 0:32
That's what I meant. Can you help me find where I went wrong? – Jason Mar 28 '13 at 0:39

I do not see where you used Lagrange multipliers. Any critical points will satisfy the Lagrange multipliers equation

$$ \begin{bmatrix} yz & xz & xy \end{bmatrix} = \lambda \begin{bmatrix} 2x & 4y & 6z \end{bmatrix} \ . $$

This gives you the system of equations

$$ \begin{align} yz &= 2\lambda x & (1) \\ xz &= 4\lambda y & (2) \\ xy &= 6\lambda z & (3) \\ 96 &= x^2+2y^2+3z^2 & (4) \end{align} $$

First consider $\lambda = 0$ and then consider other cases. Try this and see how it goes for you. I hope this helps.


If you assume $x,y,z\neq 0$, you can solve for $\lambda$ in each of $(1), (2), (3),$ and $(4)$. You then obtain (by equating these $\lambda$), as you did, $6y^2=96$, which gives $y=\pm4$. You similarly obtain $x^2 = 32$, or $x=\pm4\sqrt{2}$, and $z^2 = \frac{32}{3}$, or $z=\pm4\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}$. With all of the $\pm$'s, you get a few critical points. Plug them in to see which ones are the largest/smallest.

share|cite|improve this answer
assume all variables are non-zero, since otherwise f=0, and we ignore that case for the time-being. – Brady Trainor Mar 28 '13 at 0:25
I did use lambda. Someone edited it out by mistake. – Jason Mar 28 '13 at 0:30
I still need help. – Jason Mar 28 '13 at 0:31
@Ryan: I added some more to my answer. Hopefully this will help (and my algebra is not wrong). I did not check the critical points from the other cases, so you may have other cases to explore. – user59083 Mar 28 '13 at 1:00
Wouldn't 6y^2 = 96, give you y = +-4? – Jason Mar 28 '13 at 1:03

With the the combination of critical points, the global max would be 128/3 and global min would be -128/3. Just any combination of multiple of negatives or positives that produces the positive(max) end and negative end(min).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.