Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I have $\frac{X/n_1}{Y/n_2}$ where $X$ and $Y$ are independent chi-squared random variables, with degrees of freedom $n_1$ and $n_2$, respectively, then the distribution of this ratio is given by the $F$-distribution. If I have, instead, $\frac{X}{Y + k}$ where $k$ is a constant, what would the distribution be?

share|cite|improve this question
It's likely nonstandard and can almost certainly be obtained the same way the density of the $F$-distribution is normally derived: Change of variables. Question: Is $k \geq 0$? – cardinal Apr 21 '11 at 21:55
yes, in particular, k>0 – ACAC Apr 21 '11 at 22:27
up vote 5 down vote accepted

This question can be resolved via change of variables. Let's generalize slightly to consider two independent gamma-distributed random variables. Let $\newcommand{\G}{\Gamma}X\sim \G(r_1, \lambda)$ and $Y \sim \G(r_2, \lambda)$, where $\G(r,\lambda)$ denotes a distribution with density $$ f(x\;;r,\lambda) = \frac{\lambda^r x^{r-1}}{\Gamma(r)} e^{-\lambda x} \mathbf{1}_{(x > 0)} \> . $$

In what follows, we will need the following basic fact. Let $\beta > 0$ (for simplicity). Then, if $Z \sim \G(r, \lambda)$, $$ \newcommand{\e}{\mathbb{E}} \e(Z^\beta) = \lambda^{-\beta} \frac{\G(r+\beta)}{\G(r)} \> . $$ Note that there is no restriction that $\beta$ be an integer here.

Under the previously established notation, a chi-square random variable with $n$ degrees of freedom is also a $\Gamma(n/2, 1/2)$ random variable.

Define the transformation variables $U = X / (Y + k)$ and $V = Y$. Then the map $(X,Y) \mapsto (U,V)$ is one-to-one.

In particular, $X = U(V+k)$ and $Y = V\,$ so that the Jacobian is $$ J = \left| \begin{matrix} \frac{\partial x}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial x}{\partial v} \\ \frac{\partial y}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial y}{\partial v} \\ \end{matrix} \right| = \left| \begin{matrix} v+k & u \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{matrix} \right| = v+k \> , $$ and since $v > 0$, $k > 0$, we have that $|J| = J = v + k$.

The joint density of $(U,V)$ defined on $\{(u,v): u > 0, v > 0\}$ is thus $$ f_{U,V}(u,v) = |J| f_{X,Y}(x,y) = \frac{\lambda^{r_1 + r_2}}{\G(r_1)} u^{r_1 - 1} e^{-\lambda k u} \cdot \frac{(v+k)^{r_1} v^{r_2-1}}{\G(r_2)} e^{-\lambda(1+u)v} \> . $$

Now we are left to integrate out $v$ so that we can recover $f_U(u)$.

So, for $u > 0$, $$ f_U(u) = \frac{\lambda^{r_1}}{\G(r_1)} u^{r_1 - 1} (1+u)^{-r_2} e^{-\lambda k u} \cdot \int_0^\infty (v+k)^{r_1} \frac{v^{r_2-1} (\lambda(1+u))^{r_2}}{\G(r_2)} e^{-\lambda(1+u)v} \,\mathrm{d}v \> . $$

Observe that if $Z_u \sim \G(r_2, \lambda(1+u))$, then $$ \e(Z_u+k)^{r_1} = \int_0^\infty (v+k)^{r_1} \frac{v^{r_2-1} (\lambda(1+u))^{r_2}}{\G(r_2)} e^{-\lambda(1+u)v} \,\mathrm{d}v \> , $$ which provides a probabilistic interpretation of the integral.

Let's consider some special cases.

Case 1: $k = 0$.

$$ \e(Z_u+k)^{r_1} = \e Z_u^{r_1} = (\lambda(1+u))^{-r_1} \frac{\G(r_1+r_2)}{\G(r_2)} $$ and so

$$ f_U(u) = \frac{\G(r_1+r_2)}{\G(r_1)\G(r_2)} u^{r_1 - 1} (1+u)^{-(r_1+r_2)} \> . $$

From this, if $r_1 = n_1/2$, $r_2 = n_2/2$ and $\lambda = 1/2$, it's easy to see that $\frac{X/n_1}{Y/n_2} = \frac{n_2}{n_1}\frac{X}{Y+k} \sim F(n_1,n_2)$, as we should expect.

Case 2: $r_1$ is integral.

If $r_1$ is an integer (e.g., in the chi-square case, if the degrees of freedom of the numerator are even) then, $$ \e(Z_u+k)^{r_1} = \sum_{i=0}^{r_1} {r_1 \choose i} k^{r_1-i} \e(Z_u^i) \>, $$ and so the expression for $\e(Z_u^i)$ can be used to obtain a "closed-form" (at least if you admit the gamma function) expression for the density.

share|cite|improve this answer
+1 (you are raising the level of MSE). Two quibbles: the Jacobian being a (signed) determinant, you might replace the first occurrence of $|J|$ by $J$ (but certainly not the second one). And I got confused at first reading by $u$ appearing in the moments of $Z$, until I realized that the distribution of $Z$ depends on $u$ (yes I am slow...). Maybe use $Z_u$ instead of $Z$ to help the reader. (Once again: good job.) – Did Apr 23 '11 at 7:45
@Didier, thanks for the kind remarks and the suggestions, which I've incorporated into the answer. I originally had $|J| = J = |\cdot| = v+k$ in that display equation, but thought that was overly explicit. Your remarks have changed my mind. Indicating the dependence on $u$ of $Z$ was also a very good suggestion. – cardinal Apr 23 '11 at 16:32

Define $Z=X/(Y+c)$. Let's find the CDF $F_Z(x) = P( X/(Y+c) < x ) = P(X < Yx + cx)$.

Since Y is a random variable, we can calculate this as

$F_Z(x) = \int_0^\infty P(X < xy + cx) f_Y(y) \mathrm d y = \int_0^\infty F_X( x(y+c) ) f_Y(y) \mathrm d y$

Now differentiate by $x$ to get the PDF of $Z$:

$f_Z(x) = \int_0^\infty f_X( x(y+c) ) (y+c) f_Y(y) \mathrm d y$

Substituting the appropriate PDF, we get

$f_Z(x) = \frac{1}{2^k \gamma(k/2)^2} \int_0^\infty [x(y + c)/2]^{k/2-1} \mathrm e^{-x(y+c)/2} y^{k/2-1} \mathrm e^{-y/2} \mathrm d y$

which according to Mathematica evaluates to

$f_Z(x) = \frac{2^{\frac{1}{2}-k} c^{\frac{1}{2} (-1+k)} e^{\frac{1}{4} (c-c x)} \sqrt{\pi } (1+x)^{\frac{1}{2}-\frac{k}{2}} \text{BesselK}\left[\frac{1}{2} (-1+k),\frac{1}{4} c (1+x)\right] \text{Csc}\left[\frac{k \pi }{2}\right]}{\text{Gamma}\left[1-\frac{k}{2}\right] \text{Gamma}\left[\frac{k}{2}\right]^2}$

This assumes that $X$ and $Y$ have the same degrees of freedom, $k$.

ed: Corrected per @cardinal's warning.

share|cite|improve this answer
(-1) If $Y$ is a chi-square random variable, then $Y + k$ is not a noncentral chi-square random variable. – cardinal Apr 21 '11 at 22:15
I think this is still incorrect. – cardinal Apr 22 '11 at 0:26
Please be specific about which part. – Emre Apr 22 '11 at 0:39
Can you think of a sanity check you might try? – cardinal Apr 22 '11 at 0:52
I need to check this. What do you mean by "the degrees of freedom k is common to X and Y", you mean the same? – ACAC Apr 22 '11 at 2:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.