Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm studying manifold theory and I've got to the point of discussing the definition of a vector bundle. The definition is quite long and a bit confusing and I was wondering if someone with a bit more intiution in this topic could explain it prehaps using a nice example.

For completeness this is the definition I have:

A smooth real vector bundle $(E,M,\pi)$ of rank $k\in\mathbb{N}_0$ is a smooth manifold $E$ of dimension $m+k$ ($E$ is the total space), another smooth manifold $M$ of dimension $m$ ($M$ is the base manifold) and a smooth surjective map $\pi:E\rightarrow M$ (projection map) such that

  1. $\exists$ an open cover $\{U_{\alpha}\}$ of $M$ and diffeomorphisms $\psi_\alpha:\pi^{-1}(U_\alpha)\rightarrow U_\alpha\times\mathbb{R}^k$,

  2. $\forall p \in M$, $\psi_\alpha(\pi^{-1}(p)) = \{p\}\times\mathbb{R}^k,$

  3. Whenever $U_\alpha\cap U_\beta \not= \emptyset$, the map $$\psi_\alpha\circ\psi_\beta^{-1}:(U_\alpha\cap U_\beta) \times\mathbb{R}^k\rightarrow(U_\alpha\cap U_\beta) \times\mathbb{R}^k$$ has to take the form $(x,v)\rightarrow(x,A_{\alpha\beta}v)$, where $A_{\alpha\beta}:U_\alpha\cap U_\beta\rightarrow GL_{\mathbb{R}}(k)$ is smooth.

Thanks in advance.

share|cite|improve this question
Let us start with the most trivial example of a vector bundle one can think of, a vector bundle over a point. This is (essentially) just a vector space. Then what about vector bundles over more interesting spaces. I like to think of it as a "parameterized vector space" where the space of parameters is the base space. – Baby Dragon Mar 27 '13 at 1:07
up vote 6 down vote accepted

A rank $k$ vector bundle over a manifold $M$ can be viewed as a twisted version of the Cartesian product $M \times \Bbb R^k$. Given an appropriate cover $U_\alpha$ of $M$, the transition functions $A_{\alpha\beta}$ tell us how to glue together the local products $U_\alpha \times R^k$ to get the total space $E$. If all transition functions map all overlap points to the identity $I \in \mathrm{GL}(k, \Bbb R)$, then there is no twisting and we just get the Cartesian product $M \times \Bbb R^k$.

One example is as follows. Consider the circle $S^1$, thought of as the set $\Bbb R/2\pi \Bbb Z$. We will construct two rank $1$ vector bundles on $S^1$. Cover $S^1$ by the open sets $U_1 = (0, 2\pi)$ and $U_2 = (-\pi, \pi)$. We have that $$U_1 \cap U_2 = (0, \pi) \cup (\pi, 2\pi).$$ Assume that on the component $(0, \pi)$, the transition function is given by $$A_{12}(x) = 1 \text{ for all } x \in (0, \pi).$$ Since a transition function must be continuous, we see that the only possibilities for $A_{12}|_{(\pi, 2\pi)}$ are \begin{align*} \text{(a)} & \quad A_{12}(x) = 1 \text{ for all } x \in (\pi, 2\pi), \\ \text{(b)} & \quad A_{12}(x) = -1 \text{ for all } x \in (\pi, 2\pi). \end{align*} Case (a) gives the trivial rank $1$ vector bundle over $S^1$, $E = S^1 \times \Bbb R$.. In case (b), we have that the total space $E$ is the (infinite) Möbius band.

share|cite|improve this answer
@Stephen: Yes, I'm using the fact that $U_1 \cap U_2$ is disconnected, so we can choose two different values for $A_{12}$ on each component. In general, $A_{12}$ does not need to be constant on each component, I just made it that way for this simple example. I've also used the fact that transition functions determine the bundle. – Henry T. Horton Mar 27 '13 at 1:31
@HenryTHorton I see this makes a lot more sense now. Thanks. – user67881 Mar 27 '13 at 1:36

Theres another way to see that a bundle is a kind of 'twisted product' in a very general kind of way; and this is to use a little category theory.

First, a bundle in its most general form is simply an arrow $E \rightarrow M$. Now consider the categorical definition of the product $F \leftarrow E \rightarrow M$; this defines $E$ as the product of $F$ and $M$ in the category we are using (suppose for definiteness it is the category of manifolds, then the product$F \times M$ is the usual product in manifolds).

Now, when we remove the left hand arrow we think of the remainder $E \rightarrow M$ as a generalised product - a twisted product.

In this generality this is difficut to work with; so other axioms are demanded to make it amenable.

For example:

a. that it has fibres: the category has a terminal object and the pullback $E_p$ over it exists; This object is the fibre where $p:1 \rightarrow M$ lands. Note that fibres may differ over $M$.

b. That the fibres are all isomorphic; then we say the fibre is typical.

c. local triviality: this requires that we work in a topological context, so our bundle is at least equipped with a topology. Then we demand each pullback $E_U$ exists (for $U$ sufficiently small); it is locally trivial if it is a product of $U$ and another object $F$; note that over different places in $M$ we do not get a typical fibre. This is simply a modification of the first of the above.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.