Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My question is from Example 1.9 on P22 of Introduction to Probability, 2nd Ed., by Bertsekas and Tsitsiklis.

Define the event $A$ = {an aircraft is present} and $R$ = {the radar registers an aircraft presence}. Express the following events in terms of $A$, $R$, and/or their complements.

$\begin{align} & \text{(i) The radar correctly registers an aircraft presence}\text{.} \\ & \text{(ii) The radar falsely registers an aircraft presence}\text{.} \\ & \text{(iii) A false alarm} \\ & \text{(iv) A missed detection} \\ \end{align}$

From the definition of $A$ and $R$, I understand that both (ii) and (iii) must involve $A^C$ and $R$. However, how do I tell which is $(R | A^C )$ and which is $(R \cap A^C)$? I understand that their probabilities are related through the definition of Conditional Probability.

I have the similar issue with: (i), which I understand must contain $A$ and $R$ and (iv), which I understand must contain $A$ and $R^C$. Thank you very much.

The answers, from the textbook, are:

(i) $(R | A )$ (ii) $(R | A^C )$ (iii) $(R \cap A^C)$ (iv) $(A \cap R^C)$.

share|improve this question
    
Why must (ii) and (iii) involve $A$ and not $A^C$? Must there be a aircraft present for a false alarm? –  Mohamed Hashi Mar 25 '13 at 22:20
    
How is $R\mid A^c$ defined? –  Stefan Hansen Mar 25 '13 at 22:21
    
@Sadar: Thank you. Typos fixed. Stefan Hansen: I edited my post. –  Law Area 51 Proposal - Commit Mar 25 '13 at 22:25
1  
I would have gone for (i) $R\cap A$, (ii) $R \cap A^c$, (iii) same as (ii), and (iv) $R^c \cap A$. The notation $A|B$ is new to me, and questionable at best. –  copper.hat Mar 25 '13 at 22:30

2 Answers 2

up vote 5 down vote accepted

There's no such thing as $A\mid B$. When one writes $\Pr(A\mid B)$, one is NOT writing about the probability of something that's called $A\mid B$.

It is NOT the conditional probability of something called $A\mid B$.

Rather, it is the conditional probability given $B$, of $A$.

The distinctions that the authors are making are distinctions in their own conventions and are worth avoiding. I think that book is deficient in a number of respects. Unfortunately, books that avoid mistakes of that kind don't really call the reader's attention to things like what I wrote above, and so those mistakes persist.

A probability is of course a number. An event is not a number. An event may be an intersection of two sets. An event is never a conditional probability, since an event is not a number.

share|improve this answer
1  
Thank you for your response. Are you saying that in this example it's correct to represent the probability of (ii) by either $Pr(R|A^C)$ or $Pr(R \cap A^C) $, after which the probability of (iii) must be represented by the other notation that's left? In other words, there's no definitive choice here? –  Law Area 51 Proposal - Commit Mar 25 '13 at 22:27
    
Basically, the language is unpleasantly vague in all four cases. –  Michael Hardy Mar 25 '13 at 22:29
    
Thank you for your response. Since $\Pr \left(R \cap A^C \right) \neq \Pr \left(R|A^C \right)$ in general, should this example just be ignored and skipped? –  Law Area 51 Proposal - Commit Mar 26 '13 at 16:00
    
Perhaps..... but you should make sure you know the meanings of the various notations. –  Michael Hardy Mar 27 '13 at 1:09
    
Thank you very much. –  Law Area 51 Proposal - Commit Mar 30 '13 at 12:45

The textbook answers are wrong. They are all intersections $\bigcap$, the events are correct but this symbol $|$ is wrong. Typos like this should not make it into a published book but they often do. Care to calculate that probability?

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.