Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The following system is an example in a book of dynamical system(in the section about Hopf Bifurcation).

$$ \begin{align} \dot{x}=\mu x- y-x\sqrt{x^2+y^2} \\ \dot{y}=x + \mu y-y\sqrt{x^2+y^2} \end{align} $$

But I don't understand why it can be called a $C^1$-system, i.e., the vector field $f:R^2\times R\to R^2$ defined by this systemm belongs to $C^1(R^2\times R)$, i.e., all of the first partial derivatives with respect to $x,y$ and $\mu$ are continuous for all $x,y$ and $\mu$.

I set it as an exercise, and found that $$ \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}= \left( \begin{array}{c} \mu-(\sqrt{x^2+y^2}+\frac{x^2}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) \\ 1-\frac{xy}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}} \\ \end{array} \right) $$ This is not even defined at $(0,0,\mu)$. Then why $f\in C^1(R^2\times R)$?

Edit: The original question finally boils down to another question:

What exactly is the definition of $C^1$ functions, or more generally $C^k$ functions? Are the $k$-th derivatives allowed to have removable-discontinuity points?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

You have a function $f:(x,y) \mapsto f(x,y)=(u(x,y),v(x,y))$ defined by expressions containing square roots (or maybe denominators). At all points $(x_0,y_0)$ where the radicand (the denominator) is nonzero you may calculate the partial derivative ${\partial f\over \partial x}$ using the rules of calculus. At points $(x_0,y_0)$ where the radicand is zero the function $f$ may fail to be differentiable because the function $t\mapsto \sqrt{t}$ is not differentiable at zero. It follows that we have to check such points separately (hoping that a "special effect" comes to our help). In the example at hand the only special point is the origin. Here we use the actual definition of partial derivative and obtain, e.g., $${\partial u \over\partial x}(0,0)=\lim_{x\to 0}{u(x,0)-u(0,0)\over x} = \lim_{x\to 0}{\mu x -x|x| - 0 \over x} =\mu\ .$$ This shows that ${\partial u\over\partial x}$ is also defined at $(0,0)$, so it is defined everywhere. We still have to check that it is continuous at $(0,0)$. Now for $(x,y)\ne(0,0)$ you have obtained $${\partial u\over\partial x}=\mu-\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\Bigl(1+{x^2\over x^2+y^2}\Bigl )\ .$$ Here the last factor has a value between $1$ and $2$. As $\lim_{(x,y)\to(0,0)}\sqrt{x^2+y^2}=0$ it follows that $$\lim_{(x,y)\to(0,0)}\ {\partial u\over\partial x}=\mu={\partial u\over\partial x}(0,0)\ .$$ This proves that $u(\cdot,\cdot)$ is indeed $C^1$ on all of ${\mathbb R}^2$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.