Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In An Introduction to Smooth manifolds by Lee is written: for any smooth vector fields V and W on a manifold $M$, let $\theta$ be the flow of $V$, and define a vector $(\mathcal{L}_v W)_p$ at each $p\in M$, called the Lie derivative of $W$ with respect to $V$ at p, by

$$(\mathcal{L}_v W)_p = -d/dt|_{t=0} (\theta_{-t})_{*} W_{\theta_{t}(p)}=\lim_{t\to 0}\frac{(\theta_{-t})_{*} W_{\theta_{t}(p)}-W_p}{t}$$

Now, my question is about pushforward. If the manifold is equipped with Levi Civita connection, then what is the difference between push $W_{\theta_{t}(p)}$ forward to the point $p$ by $(\theta_{-t})_{*}$ and parallel transport $W_{\theta_{t}(p)}$ to the point $p$ by Levi-Civita connectin?

thanks!

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Parallel transport depends heavily on the metric while the pushforward along the flow does not.

I would work out some simple examples to get a feel for the difference. For example, define a vector field on $\mathbb R^2$ by $v = y \frac{\partial}{\partial x} - x \frac{\partial}{\partial y}$. Then the flow, $\phi_t$, of $v$ is rotation by the angle $t$. The pushforward ${\phi_t}_* : T_p \mathbb R^2 \to T_{\phi_t(p)} \mathbb R^2$ is also rotation by the angle $t$ (using the canonical identification of $T_p \mathbb R^2 \simeq \mathbb R^2$). On the other hand, with this identification of $T_p \mathbb R^2 = \mathbb R^2$ and using the usual flat metric, parallel transport (along any curve) is the identity map on $\mathbb R^2$.

share|improve this answer
    
thanks for the answer. –  Sepideh Bakhoda Mar 24 '13 at 19:30

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.