Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

There is a group of people, each individual with probability $0.2$ has $0$ child, with probability $0.6$ has $1$ child, with $0.2$ has $2$ children, then after a very long(you can think as infinity long) time

A This group will be extinct
B This group will have a population of infinity
C The population of this group will be stable in a range
D Not enough information

My solution:
Intuitively, Because Expectation=$0.2*0+0.6*1+0.2*0.2=1$, so I feel it should be stable in a range. But why this is wrong?

I want to get a feeling why it will be extinct? Or how can we explain it intuitively?

share|cite|improve this question
Doesn't each person have two parents, making the population half in size each generation, and eventually exctinct? – Jan Dvorak Mar 23 '13 at 22:35
how did you get to the "stable in a range"? if everyone has one child (in average), thus there is infinity people of infinitely generations. (But I don't understand the sense of the question and answers) – V-X Mar 23 '13 at 22:35
This is a special case of branching process, look out this question for some insight: – Jean-Sébastien Mar 23 '13 at 22:35
One can show that almost surely, there will be extinction of the population if the mean of the reproduction distribution is less than or equal to $1$, provided $0$ child is possible. Unfortunately i can't type the proof, but it has to do with fixed point of the generating function of the reproduction law. See for example – Jean-Sébastien Mar 23 '13 at 22:38

This is a case of Gambler's ruin. If you keep trying long enough, with probability $1$ the group will go extinct. As written, the question does not specify how many generations you try for, so you might have a good chance of still having some individuals.

share|cite|improve this answer
After a very long time – nkhuyu Mar 23 '13 at 22:40
@nkhuyu $O(pop^2)$ – Jan Dvorak Mar 23 '13 at 22:41
as opposed to $(\ln(pop))$ if the expectation is below $1$ – Jan Dvorak Mar 23 '13 at 22:42

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.