Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'd like to know the reason behind some notations used when handling derivatives and integrals.

For example, why does $x' = 1 \frac{d}{dx}$ and not simply $1$? Related to this, why is integral of that written as $\int 1dx$ and not $\int 1 \frac{d}{dx}$?

Also, when writing out the result of an integral why should we add the constant? as in $\int x dx = \frac{x^2}{2} + C$.

share|improve this question
5  
Who writes $x' = 1\frac{d}{dx}$? In all versions of notation that I am familiar with, $\frac{d}{dx}$ would be an operator, so the expression you write is not a well-formed formula. –  Arturo Magidin Apr 19 '11 at 19:32
    
    
@Arturo It is really a funny mistake right? I wonder if we should contact the instructor ;). –  Glen Wheeler Apr 19 '11 at 19:37
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

First, the derivative can be rewritten as a difference quotient. Let's do it step by step.

Let $f(x)=x$ be a function and derive it by its only dependent $x$. The derivative $\frac{d}{dx}f(x)$ of a function $f(x)$ can be interpreted as the slope of the function at a point $x$. Let's do that visually by drawing the graph of the function $f(x)=2x+1$. Now draw a little triangle below (or above) the graph between $x_1=1$ and $x_2=2$, thus between $f(x_1)=3$ and $f(x_2)=5$.

Now use this triangle to calculate the slope of $f(x)$, which gives you the difference quotient:$$\frac{f(x_2)-f(x_1)}{x_2-x_1}$$ But we do not want the averaged slope between $x_1$ and $x_2$, but the slope in a single point $x$.

The idea is, to let the difference of $x_2$ and $x_1$ become very small (colloquial: zero). So, the very general form of a difference quotient is $$\frac{f(x+\delta x)-f(x)}{\delta x}$$ where $\delta x$ is the distance between $x_1$ and $x_2$ and thus $\delta x \rightarrow 0$.

And this difference quotient is nothing else but the derivative of $f(x)$ derived by the variable $x$. And the origin of the '$d$' in $dx$ becomes clear, as it is the $\delta$ in $\delta x$. (with partial derivatives you usually do not write '$d$' but '$\delta$')

Second, with an integral, you do it the other way round. Finding the function $f(x)$ when you've got its derivative $f'(x)$. Thus, you are not calculating a difference quotient any more and thus you do not have $\frac{d}{dx}$.

You write $dx$ at the end of an integral, to show, that the function is integrated by the variable $x$. This becomes very important, when you deal with functions, which are dependent on more than one variable. (Edit: Ha01 gave a better explanation on this.)

Third, when you derive our function $f(x)=2x+1$, it gives you $f'(x)=2$. The constant term $1$ disappears. Now take another function $g(x)=2x+5$. Its derivative $g'(x)$ is as well constant $2$.

When you calculate the anti-derivative, you have to take into account that any constant term will disappear with every derivative. And thus not to specify one single anti-derivative, you denote the constant term $C$ to describe a family of functions.

share|improve this answer
    
K.: If you want $\Delta x$ (which is rather more common than $\delta x$) you can use \Delta to produce $\Delta$. –  Arturo Magidin Apr 19 '11 at 20:31
add comment

For the first question - it depends on the variable that you derive by. If you derive $x$ by $x$, i.e. $x'=\frac{dx}{dx}=1$ then you simply wtite 1. As to the second question, the indefinite integral should give you an "anti-derivative" of the function, and there are a lot of them, but they differ by a constant, hence you add $C$, to represent the family of constants.

share|improve this answer
    
More specifically, $C$ represents the kernel of the derivative. Hence, in order to define an anti-derivative you need to look at the factor space, modulo the kernel. –  Dennis Gulko Apr 19 '11 at 19:25
add comment

The notation $x'$ is ambiguous. If the prime ($'$) is differentiation with respect to $x$, then $x' = 1$. Otherwise if the prime denotes differentiation with respect to some other variable, say $t$, then $x' = \frac{dx}{dt}$.

You can think of the expression $\frac{d}{dx}$ as an operator acting on functions $f(x)$ by differentiation with respect to $x$. Now, $dx$ by itself is something quite different, being really a measure (or one of several notions). In elementary calculus, it is a little object which tells us how to measure the length of intervals. It is not a derivative!

For the second question, the derivative of any constant is zero, and so to be correct one must add on a constant (which may be zero) when integrating.

share|improve this answer
add comment

At first, $dx$ was just a notation. The reason was that integral is like a sum: $\int x dx $ ~ $ \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} x_i \cdot (x_{i+1}-x_{i})$. The expression $x_{i+1}-x_{i}$ was denoted by $\Delta x$ and so integral is a sum where $\sum$ is transformed to $\int$ and $\Delta x$ is transformed to $dx$.

But then, the theory of differential forms was created and $dx$ got an actual meaning as $d$ applied to $x$. Now it is gets complicated ;). Here $x$ is a function, $d$ is an operator that transforms differential forms of order $k$ to differential forms of order $k+1$. Functions are differentail forms of order $0$, so $dx$ is a differential form of order $1$.

The differential form of order $k$ is not a very complicated object in its simplest form. You can imagine it as a function of a point and $k$ vectors. This function must be linear with respect to each of $k$ vectors and it must change a sign if you exchange any two vector arguments (like that: $f(x,v_1,v_2,...,v_k) = -f(x,v_2,v_1,...,v_k)$).

$dx$ is defined as a function that takes a point $x$ and vector $v$ and returns $v_x$ - the coordinate of vector $v$ along the axis $x$ (so this function doesn't even depend on the point $x$!). This function linear with respect to $v$ and there is only a single vector argument and so there is nothing to exchange.

$f(x)dx$ is a function that takes a point $x$ and vector $v$ and returns $f(x)v_x$.

There is a general rule that you can take a differential form of order $k$ and a $k$-dimensional surface and calculate an integral of this form along this surface.

share|improve this answer
1  
I think your history is not quite right; in fact, "at first" (i.e., with Leibnitz), "dx" had an actual, if somewhat fuzzy, meaning (and the integral sign was really just a large $S$, standing for sum). –  Arturo Magidin Apr 19 '11 at 20:18
    
Leibnitz wouldn't be able to explain what this $dx$ is as an object on a modern exam unlike an integral. So I consider it as part of the notion. Mathematicians tried to deal with $dx$ as number back then and as result we have a zoo of strange notations today. –  Ha01 Apr 19 '11 at 20:40
    
@Hao1: While Leibnitz wouldn't be able to explain it in a modern exam (lacking the notions), that does not change the fact that the notation originates with him and that when he introduced it, "dx" did have a meaning, contrary to your assertion that "at first [it] was just notation". At first, it wasn't. Then it became "just notation" later. –  Arturo Magidin Apr 20 '11 at 1:26
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.