Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

1.Let $G$ be a finite group and $P$ be a Sylow $p$-subgroups of $G$. Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$ such that $N_G(P)\subset H$. Prove that $N_G(H)=H$
2.Let $G$ be a group of order $143$. Show that Sylow 11-subgroup of $G$ is unique. Also, show that $G$ is cyclic.

share|cite|improve this question
Application of Sylow Theorems, – Md Kutubuddin Sardar Mar 22 '13 at 18:37
And I think that the tag [group-theory] should serve better for the purpose. – awllower Mar 22 '13 at 18:59
Should be two separate questions; voting to close. – user641 Mar 22 '13 at 23:06
@Steve: That’s a petty reason to close. – Brian M. Scott Mar 23 '13 at 4:09
just ask the OP to split it into 2 instead of closing. – user58512 Mar 23 '13 at 20:50

(2) has been solved, so here is (1).
I am going to assume known the argument of Frattini.
Since $P\subseteq H$, $P$ is a Sylow-p-subgroup of $H$. Since $H$ is normal in $N_G(H)$, we can apply Frattini argument to $N_G(H)$ and $H$, and obtain that $N_G(H)=HN_G(P)=H$.
Point it out if some error occurs, thanks.
The statement of Frattini argument is: Let $H$ be a normal subgroup of $G$, and $P$ a Sylow $p$-subgroup of $H$. then $G=N_G(P)H$.
Let $G$ act on $H$ by conjugation, which is valid since $H$ is normal in $G$. Then for any $g\in G$, $gPg^{-1}$ is a Sylow $p$-subgroup of $H$, and hence, by one of the theorems of Sylow, there is $h\in H$ such that $gPg^{-1}=hPh^{-1}$, that is to say, $h^{-1}g\in N_G(P)$, so $g\in hN_G(P)\subseteq HN_G(P)$. Q.E.D.

share|cite|improve this answer

Hint for #2: Consider the prime factorization and use a theorem that says $G=HK$, $H$ and $K$ are normal in $G$ and $H\cap K=\{e\}$, then $G\cong H\times K$. Now use another property that says when this is the case, if the factors have relatively prime orders, the group is cyclic.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.