Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Evaluate the integral $$\int_V \nabla \cdot \underline{r}\,dV$$ where $V$ is bounded by the surface $S_c$($S_c$ = part of the surface $z = a^2 - x^2 - y^2$ for which $z \geq 0$) and the plane $z=0$.

Attempt: I have done it via surface integral and obtained the correct answer but when I do it by computing the above, I get something different.

$\nabla \cdot r = 3$ (special case when we take the divergence of a position vector) so we just compute $$3 \int_V dV = 3 \int_0^a \int_0^{2 \pi} \int_0^{\pi/2} r^2 \sin \theta d\theta d\phi dr.$$ Evaluating does not give the required $3 \pi a^4/2$ obtained in the surface integral calculation.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

You need to use cylindrical coordinates, as the surface has cylindrical symmetry. The integral you want is

$$3 \int_0^{a^2} dz \: \int_0^{a^2-z} dr \,r \: \int_0^{2 \pi} d\theta $$

Note that the volume element in cylindrical coordinates is $r\,dr\,d\theta\,dz$, and the bounds are explicitly set by the equation of the paraboloid. The $3$ comes from your divergence. You should be able to do out this integral.

My answer for this integral is $3 \pi a^4/2 $.

share|improve this answer
    
Do I have to do the integral in cylindrical coords? The rest of the question (i.e the part where I had to do the surface integral I did via spherical coords as outlined in the question). That said, I see my integral that I set up does not distinguish between a hemisphere and a paraboloid. –  CAF Mar 20 '13 at 9:39
    
Should they not be the same? The $3\pi a^4/2$ was a show that... so that is how I know I did that part correct. –  CAF Mar 20 '13 at 9:43
    
Why do you have to do it in spherical coordinates for a surface with cylindrical symmetry? To assign such a problem that way is not a good way to teach spherical coordinates as nobody in their right mind would compute a volume over such a region that way. A paraboloid as you define here has an axis of symmetry. –  Ron Gordon Mar 20 '13 at 9:43
    
This is the volume I get for this region. I do not know how you got your other result. I would make sure you posed the problem properly. –  Ron Gordon Mar 20 '13 at 9:45
    
The parametrisation we were given in the question was $r = asin \theta cos \phi e_1 + a \sin \theta \sin \phi e_2 + a^2 \cos^2 \theta e_3$ –  CAF Mar 20 '13 at 9:45

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.