Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

While trying obtain the dynamics of $X_t = \exp( \int_t ^T \phi_s ds)$, where $\phi$ is an Ito process following $$ d\phi_t = \mu dt+ \sigma dW_t \ ,$$ I had some doubt concerning the application of Itô's lemma.

If $g_T(t,x) := \int_t ^T x(s) ds$ which is a functional of $x$ depending of $t$ and of the parameter $T$, then $X_t = f_T(t,\phi) :=\exp(g_T(t,\phi))$, so Itô's lemma gives us that $$dX_t =df_T(t,\phi) = (\partial_t +\frac{\sigma}{2}\partial_{xx}^2) f_T(t,\phi) dt +\partial_x f_T(t,\phi) dW_t$$ My doubt is precisely about the computation of $\partial_x f_T(t,\phi)$. Is it zero or am I making a mistake?

Thus, the dynamic of $X$ must be

$$dX_t =\partial_t f_T(t,\phi) dt =-\phi_tX_tdt$$

Could someone enlight me please?

share|improve this question
    
Should it be $X_T=\exp{(\int_t^T\phi_s ds)}$ or does the process $X$ depends on the lower bound of the integral? –  user8 Mar 18 '13 at 7:49
    
What's the definition of the dynamic of a stochastic process? What have you tried? –  saz Mar 18 '13 at 7:55
2  
Very basic question: what did you try? (And how come the formatting of this question is so far from being acceptable, being your question #27 on the site?) –  Did Mar 18 '13 at 10:44
2  
You say, you have a basic doubt, but you didn't specify what do you doubt about. –  Ilya Mar 18 '13 at 12:32
2  
If $\phi$ is a diffusion and $dX_t=\sigma(X_t,\phi_t)dW_t+b(X_t,\phi_t)dt$, then $X$ is a diffusion. But if your $X$ is not a diffusion, to try to describe it as one is doomed. Here, a problem is that $X_t$ is not adapted. –  Did Mar 19 '13 at 13:48
show 7 more comments

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The point is that Ito Lemma applies to the situation where you have a function of an Ito process, rather than a functional. E.g. you can apply it in case $h(\phi_t)$, but you don't apply Ito Lemma to compute the differential of $\int_0^t\phi_s\mathrm ds$. In the latter case you rather have $$ \mathrm d\left(\int_0^t\phi_s\mathrm ds\right) = \phi_t\mathrm dt. $$ Similarly, for any continuous function $\psi \in C([0,\infty))$ you have that $$ g(t):=\int_t^T\psi(s)\mathrm ds \in C^1([0,\infty)) $$ and thus $f(t):=\exp(g(t))$ belongs to this class as well. As a result, $$ \mathrm df(t) = f'_t(t)\mathrm dt = f(t)g'_t(t)\mathrm dt = -f(t)\psi(t)\mathrm dt. $$

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.