Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know there are equations for odd numbers . But is there an equation for positive integers.

share|improve this question
1  
Is this a real question? If so, can you be more specific? What equations for odd numbers are you thinking of? It will be hard to make sense of this. – julien Mar 18 at 3:12
Well, you must be looking for $|x|$ ? Where $x$ is an integer.? – Inceptio Mar 18 at 3:13
1  
Do you mean odd positve $x$: $x = 2n - 1$ for some $n \in \mathbb Z, n\geq 1$? If so, then even positive $y: y = 2n$ for some $n\in \mathbb Z n\geq 1$. – amWhy Mar 18 at 3:15
1  
I doubt this is homework... – L. F. Mar 18 at 3:16
You need to define what structure you are working in. In a ring or field like $\mathbb Z_7$ you can't define the positive integers at all. You need an ordered (ring, field) or whatever. – Ross Millikan Mar 18 at 3:35

closed as not a real question by Antonio Vargas, DonAntonio, JSchlather, Ittay Weiss, Stefan Hansen Mar 18 at 6:26

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.

3 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I'll answer based on my comment.

We can use the following notation to denote a positive odd integer:

  • "$x$ is an odd positive integer $\iff x=2n−1\,$ for some $\,n\in \mathbb Z,n\geq 1$.

We can use the following notation to denote a positive even integer so,

  • "$y$ is a positve even integer" $\iff y = 2n\,$ for some $\,n \in \mathbb Z,\,\,n\geq 1$

These notations reflect the definitions of odd positive integers, and even positive integers, respectively:

If we change the notation to exclude the qualifications $n\geq 1$ (so that $n$ is some integer), then we have defined odd and even integers, respectively, though when defining odd integers, in general, it is more common to define them as the set of all integers $x$ that can be expressed in the form $\;x = 2n +1$ for some $n \in \mathbb Z$.

Essentially, the notation reflects that an even integer, by definition, is an integer $x$ that is divisible by $2$, and odd integer is not.

share|improve this answer

An integer $m$ is odd $\iff$ there exists an integer $n$ such that $m=2n+1$. I don't think there is something similar to this for positive integers. Well, this is slightly more advanced, but an integer $n$ is nonnegative (positive or zero) $\iff$ there exist integers $a, b, c$, and $d$ so that $n=a^{2}+b^{2}+c^{2}+d^{2}$, and $n$ is positive $\iff$ not all four of them are zero. This result is Lagrange's four square theorem, but I imagine it wasn't what you're looking for.

share|improve this answer
So, every $n$ can be represented in sum of $4$ squares? – Inceptio Mar 18 at 3:18
1  
@Inceptio: every positive $n$ if the squares are allowed to be the same and include $0$ – Ross Millikan Mar 18 at 3:19
1  
@RossMillikan: Oh well! That was an Olympiad question in our country. :) – Inceptio Mar 18 at 3:24
@Inceptio, I don't have much Olympiad experience, but that's impressive considering that result is very nontrivial. – Dylan Yott Mar 18 at 3:26
Maybe you were expected to know the four square theorem and quote it for this problem, but not prove it. – Ross Millikan Mar 18 at 3:28
show 3 more comments

You can just say $x > 0$. As far as I know there isn't an algebraic statement that enforces positiveness throughout a calculation in quite the same manner that $2x$ enforces evenness.

Anyways, be careful not to confuse math notation for math.

share|improve this answer
However,x can equal 0.01 which is not a positive integer. I want the equation for the set (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8). Thanks anyway. – yes man Mar 18 at 4:28
@yesman in that case you just say $x \in \mathbb N$ or "x is a positive integer" or "x is an integer between 1 and 8 inclusive" etc. again there isn't any algebraic statement that enforces integer-ness throughout a calculation – amr Mar 18 at 5:22

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.