Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

assume $\ [c_ic_j]_{n\times n}\in M_n(\mathbb R)$ such that $c_1,c_2,\ldots,c_n\in\mathbb R$ and $I$ be identity matrix

how compute $$\det (I+\ [c_ic_j])=?$$ Thanks in advance

share|cite|improve this question

I've already answered this question but I can't find it... Write you matrix $X=I_n+CC^T$. If $C=0$, the problem is trivial. So assume $C\neq 0$. Then note that $CC^T$ is a rank one matrix, so $0$ is an eigenvalue of multiplicity $n-1$. Now $(CC^T)C=C(C^TC)=\|C\|^2 C$. So $\|C\|^2$ is a nonzero eigenvalue of multiplicity at least $1$. It follows that, with multiplicities: $$ \mbox{spectrum} (CC^T)=\{\|C\|^2,0\ldots,0\}\quad\Rightarrow\quad\mbox{spectrum} (I_n+CC^T)=\{1+\|C\|^2,1\ldots,1\}. $$ Therefore (of course, $I_n+CC^T$ is diagonalizable from the above, or directly by observing that it is hermitian): $$ \det (I_n+CC^T)=1+\|C\|^2=1+\sum_{k=1}^nc_k^2. $$

Edit: As pointed out by @ChrisGodsil, it is true in general that $\det(I_m+AB)=\det(I_n+BA)$ for every $m\times n$ matrix $A$ and every $n\times m$ matrix $B$. This can even be generalized to the more general fact that the characteristic polynomials satisfy $$ t^m\chi_{BA}(t)=t^n\chi_{AB}(t). $$ And this holds over any ring. See here.

share|cite|improve this answer
The key is that $\det(I+AB)=\det(I+BA)$ (provided only that both products are defined). If $C$ has rank one, then $C=xx^T$ and $\det(I+xx^T)=\det(1+x^Tx) =1+x^Tx$. – Chris Godsil Mar 17 '13 at 17:15
@ChrisGodsil True, I know that, but thanks...We have in general $\chi_{BA}(t)=t^{n-m}\chi_{AB}(t)$ when $A$ is $m\times n$ and $B$ is $n\times m$ with $n\geq m$. But I don't hate the argument I gave. – 1015 Mar 17 '13 at 17:23
Your argument is fine. I like the alternative I gave because it is valid over any field, and I felt that it was worth pointing it out in a comment. – Chris Godsil Mar 17 '13 at 23:49
@ChrisGodsil Absolutely! Which is why I edited to mention your point. – 1015 Mar 18 '13 at 0:02
@ChrisGodsil Even better, thanks to you I recalled I gave a proof a month ago which I could have done without density of invertible matrices. – 1015 Mar 18 '13 at 0:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.