Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I would like to use Stokes' Theorem to find the area of a surface over a given region. This is given by:

$A = \oint\vec{F}\centerdot d\vec{r}$

but only if the following condition holds:

$(\vec{\triangledown}\times\vec{F})\centerdot \vec{n} = 1$

where $\vec{n}$ is the normal to the surface. How do I come up with a vector field, $\vec{F}$, that satisfies this condition? I found a paper that discusses an inverse-curl operator here, but this is only useful if I know what $(\vec{\triangledown}\times\vec{F})$ is and need to find $\vec{F}$. Any ideas?

share|improve this question
    
Is your surface nonplanar? If so, this is going to be difficult. Imagine a sphere with a small hole in it; what does $\nabla\times F$ have to look like? –  Rahul Apr 15 '11 at 21:43
    
@Rahul Narain: Yes, the surface is non-planar. In fact, the specific surface I'm interested in is $z=\sin(x)\sin(y)$. If I use $\vec{F}=\langle0,x,0\rangle$ it satisfies the condition, but it doesn't encode any information about z, so it would give the same answer regardless of z. –  okj Apr 15 '11 at 21:51
4  
Essentially this is a vector boundary problem in $\mathbf{G}=\nabla\times\mathbf{F}$ defined by $$\nabla\cdot\mathbf{G}=0,$$ $$\mathbf{G}|_{\partial\Omega}\cdot\mathbf{n}=1.$$ The vector field $\mathbf{F}$ can be recovered from $\mathbf{G}$ via the Helmholtz theorem. –  anon Aug 15 '11 at 2:00
    
@anon You should have posted this as answer, this question still shows up as unanswered –  Tobias Kienzler Aug 2 '13 at 10:03

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

As anon put it in a comment:

Essentially this is a vector boundary problem in $\mathbf G = \nabla \times \mathbf F$ defined by $$\begin{align} \nabla \cdot \mathbf G &=0\\ \mathbf G \vert_{\partial \Omega}\cdot \mathbf n &= 1 \end{align}$$ The vector field $\mathbf F$ can be recovered from $\bf G$ via the Helmholtz theorem.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.