Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I have a current going through a wire, I can say say that:

$$i = \frac{dq}{dT} = \frac{Q}{T}$$

If there is some sort of symmetry or homogeneity. If I were to solve this Differential Equation, I would find:

$$\int \frac{dq}{Q}=\int \frac{dT}{T} \implies Q = \pm e^{c + ln|T|} = CT$$

This is similar to having a uniform (homogenous) mass density, so that I may write density as:

$$\rho = \frac{dm}{dv} = \frac{m}{v}$$

So is the necessary mathematical condition that Q = CT for me to write current as $i = \frac QT$ ? Is this a necessary condition for homogeneity?

share|cite|improve this question
How are $q$ and $Q$ related? – John Moeller Mar 14 '13 at 23:04
Assuming that Q is just some total charge accumulated over time, I think you're on the right track. The diff. eq. should work basically the same as the homogeneous mass density one. – John Moeller Mar 14 '13 at 23:17
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I think you have conditions/conclusions a little mixed up.

In general, you only know that $i = \frac{dQ}{dT}$ - that is what the physical law says.

If you are working on a special case, and someone has told you $i = \frac{Q}{T}$, then yes, you could conclude that $Q = CT$. This information might be stated slightly differently, e.g. they might say "in this case, there is a steady (constant) flow of charge through the wire", in which case you can interpret that to mean $i = \frac{Q}{T}$, from which you can conclude $Q = CT$. (using the proof you give in your question)

Likewise, if you were told ahead of time "in this wire, $Q = CT$", then you could differentiate to get $\frac{dQ}{dT} = C$. Since you know from physical law that $i = \frac{dQ}{dT}$, you can say $i = C$. Then, going back to $Q = CT$ and dividing both sides by $T$ shows $\frac{Q}{T} = C$ as well, finally allowing you to conclude $i = \frac{Q}{T}$.

Thus, the two statements are equivalent (they imply each other, or said another way, one is a necessary and sufficient condition to conclude the other, and vice versa), but you can't just assume one of these conditions are true without some justification, or some special situation.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you. it is so obvious now! – Cactus BAMF Mar 15 '13 at 14:42

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.