Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $f(X)\in\mathbb{Q}[X]$ be a square-free polynomial, that is, not divisible by any prime of $\mathbb{Q}[X]$. Let $K:=\mathbb{Q}(X)[Y]$, where $Y$ is a square root of $f(X)$, or equivalently $Y$ solves the monic polynomial equation given by $T^2-f(X)=0$. I want to compute $O_{K}$, the integral closure of $\mathbb{Q}[X]$ in $K$.

There is a trivial case: $Y\in\mathbb{Q}(X)$. In this case, $K=\mathbb{Q}(X)$ hence the integral closure of $\mathbb{Q}[X]$ in $K$ coincides with the integral closure of $\mathbb{Q}[X]$ in its field of fractions, which is $\mathbb{Q}[X]$ itself, since $\mathbb{Q}[X]$ is a UFD and UFD'S are integrally closed domains.

So we assume $Y\notin\mathbb{Q}(X)$. In this case, the set $\{1,Y\}$ provides a basis for $K$ (as a $\mathbb{Q}(X)$-vector space): every element $\xi\in K$ can be written in a unique way as

$$\xi=x+yY, \ \textrm{with} \ \ x,y\in\mathbb{Q}(X)$$

An easy computation provides the minimal polynomial of $\xi$ over $\mathbb{Q}(X)$, which is


If we assume $\xi$ integral over $\mathbb{Q}[X]$, then it is well known that $m_{\xi}$ has coefficients in $\mathbb{Q}[X]$

$$2x\in\mathbb{Q}[X], x^2-y^2f\in\mathbb{Q}[X]$$

Now, $2x\in\mathbb{Q}[X]$ clearly implies $x\in\mathbb{Q}[X]$ and $x\in\mathbb{Q}[X]$ implies $y^2f\in\mathbb{Q}[X]$.

Now suppose that some prime $p(X)$ of $\mathbb{Q}[X]$ divides the denominator of $y$. We get $p^2|f$, which contradicts the square-free hypothesis. Thus $y\in\mathbb{Q}[X]$ and $\xi\in\mathbb{Q}[X]+\mathbb{Q}[X]Y$, so that $O_k=\mathbb{Q}[X][Y]$ in this particular quadratic extension of $\mathbb{Q}(X)$.

My question is: can be stated something more than this? I mean, this setting reminds me a similar situation, where we have $\mathbb{Z}$ in place of $\mathbb{Q}[X]$, $\mathbb{Q}$ in place of $\mathbb{Q}(X)$ and $\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{d}]$ in place if $K$, with $d$ an integer, $d\neq 0,1$, $d$ squarefree. In this case we have $O_K=\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{d}]$ if $d\equiv 2,3 (mod \ 4)$, $O_K=\mathbb{Z}[\frac{1+\sqrt{d}}{2}]$ if $d\equiv 1 (mod \ 4)$.

So i'm asking if there is an analogy among the present case and the other one, or not.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The situations are fully analogous, except for the special role of the prime $2$ of $\mathbb Z$. If we kill that prime by instead taking the ground ring to be the localization $\mathbb Z[1/2]=R$, whose maximals are all the primes but $2$, then the integral closure of $R$ in $\mathbb Q(\sqrt d)$ is $R[\sqrt d]$, no matter what the congruence of $d$ is. The “special role” of $2$ arises precisely from the coefficient $2$ in the trace of $\xi$, namely $2x$ in your notation.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.