Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question is in some sense equivalent to my question here. A proof would answer that question in the case when the base field is perfect.

Let $G$ be a profinite group of cardinality $\kappa$, where $\kappa$ is an infinite cardinal. Is it the case that for every infinite cardinal $\mu \leq \kappa$ there's a subgroup $H \subset G$ of cardinality $\mu$? As a follow-up does there need to be a such a subgroup that's normal (I'm just curious about this)?

I don't have a good intuition for infinite group theory and I have an even worse understanding of profinite groups, so I have made little progress on this question.

Edit: It seems to me that for a group $G$, a subgroup $H \subset G$ and $g \in G \setminus H$ we have that $|\langle g,H\rangle|\leq \max\{\aleph_0,|H|\}.$ This would seem to imply that a transfinite induction argument would answer the question yes in the general case.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted
+50

Let $G$ be an infinite group of cardinality $\kappa$. Then, over ZFC, I can show:

  1. For each infinite cardinal $\lambda < \kappa$ there is a proper subgroup of cardinality $\lambda$
  2. In general there is no proper subgroup of cardinality $\kappa$
  3. If $G$ is profinite, there are proper subgroups of all cardinalities $\le \kappa$

Proof: i) Choose a subset $X\subseteq G$ of cardinality $\lambda$. Then $H := \langle X \rangle$ is a subgroup of cardinality $\lambda$; in particular, it's a proper subgroup.

ii) $\mathbb{Z}_{p^\infty}:= \{z \in \mathbb{C}^\times\mid \exists n>0: z^{p^n}=1\}$ ($p$ a prime) is countably infinite, but all proper subgroups are finite (Rotman, Introduction to the Theory of Groups, Theorem 10.13).

iii) In the profinite case, $G=\varprojlim_N G/N$ where $G/N$ is finite. Hence the cardinality of $N$ is $\kappa$.

share|improve this answer
    
In 1. you need to assume that $\lambda$ is infinite, of course. Otherwise this is spot on. –  Pete L. Clark Mar 19 '13 at 20:42
    
In discussing 2., one might also want to mention Tarski monster groups: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarski_monster_group. –  Pete L. Clark Mar 19 '13 at 20:45
    
Yes, of course. Thanks for the hint, Pete. –  Ralph Mar 19 '13 at 20:57
    
@Ralph I am not yet good with infinite cardinals: expanding on (1), can we expect that $\langle g^{−1}Xg:g∈G\rangle$ will also be a subgroup of cardinality λ? (and thus a normal subgroup?) –  Alexander Gruber Mar 20 '13 at 5:49
    
No, this can't be expected. As an example let $X \subset Y$ be infinite sets. Then, for a fix $x \in X$, $\{yxy^{-1}\mid y \in Y\}$ is a subset of of cardinality $|Y|$ of $G := F(Y)$. Hence the supset $\langle gXg^{-1}\mid g \in G\rangle$ has cardinality $|Y|$ as well. –  Ralph Mar 20 '13 at 7:19

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.