Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

According to page 7 of the PDF document

$$ \frac{\delta}{\delta f} \int \left( \frac{df^2 }{d^2 x} \right)^2 dx = \int \frac{df^4}{d^4 x} dx $$

I would like help proving this statement.

Although I can show that

$$ \int \left( \frac{df^2 }{d^2 x} \right)^2 dx = \int \frac{df^4}{d^4 x} f dx $$

My attempts at "constructing" the functional derivative of this expression isn't dropping the term $f$. I'm not even sure this is the right way to go about solving the problem.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

Well, probably this is a case of confusing notation. Especially I am not sure where you want to have your exponents.

In my understanding, both equations you stated are just wrong. However, the first one may carry some truth: Consider the functional $J(f) = \int (\frac{d^2 f}{dx^2})^2 dx$. Then the functional derivative of $J$ (or first variation) of $J$ is (by integration by parts) $$ \delta J(f)(h) = \int 2\frac{d^2f}{dx^2}\frac{d^2h}{dx^2}dx = \int 2\frac{d^4 f}{dx^4} h dx. $$ Hence, one may say (if put in a proper framework of function spaces) that the derivative of $J$ is $$ J'(f) = 2\frac{d^4 f}{dx^4}. $$

To conclude: The pdf document you linked is very sloppy with the notation and probably you may consult a book one the calculus of variations to get more information here.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks. I get the first part, its not too different from my second equation, which BTW does not take the variation to account -- just an initial integration by parts. My problem is with the argument that leads to the second statement. Specifically, what do you mean by "if put in a proper framework of function spaces"? –  Olumide Apr 15 '11 at 14:43
    
@Dirk, I don't understand the solution. As far as I can see the E-L for this functional is different. Setting $ L \left( x, f, {f}_{x} \right) $ the E-L states that the derivative is $ {L}_{f} - \frac{d}{dx} {L}_{{f}_{x}} $. Since $ {L}_{f} $ vanishes we're left with $ {L}_{{f}_{x}} = 2 {f}_{xx} $ deriving by x again yields $ 2 {f}_{xxx} $ while you have $ 2 {f}_{xxxx} $. –  Drazick Dec 14 at 7:44

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.