Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to graph $x^{2/3}$. If I enter $y=x^{2/3}$, my graphing program excludes negatives from the domain: x to the two-thirds However, if I enter it as either $y=\sqrt[3]{x^2}$ or $y=(x^{1/3})^2$, it includes the negative values of $x$: cube root of x-squared

I'd like to understand what's going on. My best guess is that while $x^{2/3}$ is well defined for negative values of $x$ (since the fractional exponent's denominator is an odd integer), the graphing program is being overly cautious in interpreting the expression. But that's just a guess. Any ideas what's happening here?

Thanks for the responses. As it seems this is a duplicate of a previously posted question, I'll vote to close this.

share|cite|improve this question
What about $x^{4/6}$? – Hagen von Eitzen Mar 10 '13 at 15:12
See this as well – Babak S. Mar 10 '13 at 15:14
I can't find it, but there was an earlier post with this exact problem: graphing $x^{2/3}$, with the same outcomes, depending on the way the function was keyed in, as in your case. So it's a hardware/software "thing" with the calculator. I think it was a TI-83+/84+/titanium (can't remember that). The post showed the same graphs for the same input. I can picture the post now! – amWhy Mar 10 '13 at 16:16
This boils down to: Never trust your pocket calculator (or other software) to use exactly the definition of a function that you have in mind. – Hagen von Eitzen Mar 10 '13 at 16:19
@HagenvonEitzen You're right about that :) – ivan Mar 10 '13 at 16:30
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The issue is that there are three sorts of things one could mean when one writes down an exponentiation, and the differences between them become quite significant when you consider negative bases.

Here is an answer I've written to another question talking about a similar question.

share|cite|improve this answer

It likely comes down to the fact that your graphing program is using an approximation for $2/3,$ and said approximation has an even denominator.

share|cite|improve this answer
I would think if that were the case it would do the same for 1/3, but it doesn't ($x^{1/3}$ handles the negatives no problem). You could be right though. – ivan Mar 10 '13 at 16:09

Can't post this as a comment, but note:

WolframAlpha: $y = x^{2/3}$:

enter image description here

WolframAlpha: $y = \sqrt[3]{x^2}$:

enter image description here

Note: the scales for graphing are different, but there is clearly a difference with respect to how Wolfram interprets each of the inputs. And the first plot adds an additional anomaly.

share|cite|improve this answer

Here is the reason I think Softwares interpret both expressions in a different way

$$ x^{\frac{2}{3}} = \exp\left ( \frac{2}{3} \ln \left ( x \right ) \right ) $$ Works only if $x>0$

$$ \sqrt[3]{x^{2}} = \exp\left ( \frac{1}{3} \ln \left ( x^{2} \right ) \right ) $$ Works whatever $x$ value

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.