Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let's say I have 2 vectors:

[a, b, c]
[x, y, z]

And I need to do an operation like the following for a computer program:

[a*x, b*y, c*z]

What I want to know is if this operation is defined as a common vector operation? And what can I call it? I ask this because I can't find any information about it. Of course nothing tells me I can't do this, it may just not be a "normal" vector operation.

share|improve this question
5  
It is not so common in pure mathematics. It is called coordinatewise multiplication. In matlab this is called array multiplication would be written as [a,b,c].*[x,y,z]. –  t.b. Apr 12 '11 at 10:50
4  
That would be a Hadamard product... –  J. M. Apr 12 '11 at 11:05
2  
The name Hadamard product is also used for matrices en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_multiplication#Hadamard_product Google told me that the names "vector multiply" or "componentwise product" are also used groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/… –  Martin Sleziak Apr 12 '11 at 11:19
3  
It's called the Hadamard product, Schur product, or entrywise product. –  Arturo Magidin Nov 15 '11 at 18:22
3  
@stackoverflowuser2010: your question was closed because it is a duplicate of this. Those are the rules. This is not your question. You may suggest some improvements but you went way over the top. I rolled back to the the previous version. –  t.b. Nov 15 '11 at 20:54

2 Answers 2

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Component-wise multiplication (or coordinate-wise multiplication like @Theo mentioned in his comment).

share|improve this answer

Your operation is the multiplication in the algebra of functions $\{1,\ldots,n\}\to\mathbb R$.

This algebra is a vector space with the obvious pointwise addition and scalar multiplication. It is isomorphic as a vector space to the usual $n$-dimensional vector space $\mathbb R^n$ (depending on the details of the formalization you work in, they may even be identical rather than simply isomorphic). Nevertheless, it is most common to think of it as something separate from $\mathbb R^n$.

Why is that? It is because usually when we speak about $\mathbb R^n$ we want to think of it as a concrete representation of some other vector space which we get by choosing a basis, and in most cases we have considerable liberty to choose the basis. Therefore $\mathbb R^n$ usually invokes an idea of "some abstract $n$-dimensional vector space with a more or less arbitrarily chosen basis".

However, your multiplication operation does not fit into this framework, because it is not preserved when we move to another basis. Therefore it is not a useful concept to speak of in the common situation where the basis was chosen more or less arbitrarily.

So in order to reduce the risk of confusion, we usually pretend that the component-wise product doesn't exist when we speak merely of $\mathbb R^n$. In the few situations where the multiplication is useful, we prefer to call the space something else such as to remind ourselves that our usual freedom to switch to another basis whenever it's convenient doesn't exist anymore.

In particular, you won't find the the Hadamard product listed in an article about "Euclidean vectors" -- because what makes the vectors Euclidean is that the relations between them do not change if we rotate the coordinate system. But the product does change if the coordinate system is turned.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.