Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $V$ be an $n$-dimensional variety over $k$. The function field $k(V)$ doesn't have to be separable over $k$ but I'd like to know which conditions imply that we can find a finite bijective morphism from $V$ to a variety $W$ with separable function field. In particular I want to prove this for proper irreducible varieties.

So far I've proved it for affine irreducible varieties: If $V=\text{Spec}(A)$ is affine irreducible then by Noether normalisation there exists a finite surjective morphism $k[X_1,\ldots,X_n]\hookrightarrow A$. The function field Frac$(A)$ is a finite extension of $k(X_1,\ldots,X_n)$ which splits into a separable extension $F/k(X_1,\ldots,X_n)$ followed by a purely inseparable extension Frac$(A)/F$. Then the inclusion $A\cap F\subseteq A$ corresponds finite bijective morphism $\text{Spec}(A)\rightarrow\text{Spec}(A\cap F)=W$ and $W$ has separable function field $F$ over $k$.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Suppose $k$ has characteristic $p>0$ (otherwise everything is separable).

Consider the relative Frobenius $V\to V^{(p)}$, and iterate it $n$ times to get $V\to V^{(p^n)}$. This is a finite homeomorphism.

Let us prove $k(V^{(p^n)})$ is separable over $k$. As the function field can be computed with a dense affine open subset, we can suppose $V=\mathrm{Spec}(A)$ is affine. You already showed the existence of a subextension $F\subseteq k(V)$ such that $F$ is separable and $k(V)/F$ is finite and purely inseparable. So there exists $n\ge 1$ such that $(k(V))^{p^n}\subseteq F$, therefore $k(k(V))^{p^n}$ (the sub-$k$-extension generated by $(k(V))^{p^n}$) is separable over $k$. But this is nothing but the function field of $k(V^{(p^n)})$, so we are done.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, that's elegant! – Michalis Mar 8 '13 at 11:49

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.